19078, Ridley Park, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19078, Ridley Park, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.14 percent of the residents in 19078 has some form of health insurance. 29.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.08 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19078 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,671 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 407 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19078. An estimate of 87 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,783 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 85,686 health care providers accessible to residents in 19078, Ridley Park, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Ridley Park, PA (ZIP Code 19078)

This analysis provides an "Asthma Score" assessment for primary care physicians (PCPs) in Ridley Park, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 19078), focusing on factors relevant to asthma management and patient care. This score considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health resources, all crucial for effective asthma control. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare landscape for individuals with asthma and those seeking to improve their care.

The analysis begins with an assessment of primary care availability. Ridley Park, a suburban community, likely has a mix of independent practices and those affiliated with larger healthcare systems. The overall accessibility of PCPs is a critical starting point. A high concentration of PCPs in the area, coupled with reasonable wait times for appointments, would contribute positively to the "Asthma Score." Conversely, a shortage of PCPs, leading to longer wait times or limited appointment availability, would negatively impact the score, potentially hindering timely access to asthma management and exacerbation treatment.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a significant factor. Ideally, a lower ratio indicates a greater availability of physicians per capita, allowing for more individualized attention and potentially shorter appointment times. This can be especially important for asthma patients, who often require regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and education on self-management techniques. Practices with lower physician-to-patient ratios would be favored in the "Asthma Score" analysis, reflecting their potential to offer more comprehensive and responsive care.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into individual practice characteristics. This includes evaluating the availability of specialized asthma management programs, such as asthma education classes, spirometry testing, and personalized asthma action plans. Practices that actively promote and implement these programs would receive higher scores. Furthermore, the presence of certified asthma educators (CAEs) within a practice would be a significant positive indicator, as CAEs possess specialized knowledge and skills in asthma management.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial element. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can significantly improve asthma care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those living in areas with limited access to in-person care. Practices offering telemedicine options for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and symptom management would receive higher scores. This technology enables proactive care, allowing physicians to monitor patients' conditions remotely and intervene quickly when needed.

Mental health resources are increasingly recognized as integral to asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, and conversely, mental health conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or partnerships with mental health providers, would be highly valued. This integration ensures that patients receive comprehensive care addressing both their physical and emotional needs. The availability of resources like support groups or access to mental health professionals is a key component of a well-rounded "Asthma Score."

Further, the analysis considers the responsiveness of practices to patient needs. This includes assessing the ease of scheduling appointments, the availability of after-hours care, and the responsiveness of the practice to patient inquiries. Practices that prioritize patient communication and provide readily accessible care would score higher. This responsiveness is crucial for managing asthma, where timely intervention can prevent exacerbations and improve overall quality of life.

Specific examples of practices within ZIP code 19078 are difficult to provide without violating privacy regulations. However, the methodology would involve researching publicly available information, such as practice websites, insurance provider directories, and patient reviews. These sources would be used to gather data on the factors discussed above. The "Asthma Score" would be calculated based on a weighted system, with each factor contributing to the overall score. For instance, physician-to-patient ratios might be weighted heavily, while the availability of telemedicine might receive a slightly lower weight.

The "Asthma Score" would be a relative measure, comparing practices within the 19078 ZIP code. Practices exceeding expectations in multiple areas would receive a higher score, indicating a strong commitment to asthma care. Conversely, practices falling short in several areas would receive a lower score, highlighting areas for improvement. This scoring system provides a benchmark for patients to assess their current care and make informed decisions about their healthcare.

In conclusion, a comprehensive "Asthma Score" analysis for Ridley Park, PA (19078) requires a multi-faceted approach. It considers the availability of PCPs, physician-to-patient ratios, specialized asthma programs, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a clear and concise assessment of the local healthcare landscape, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their asthma care. This analysis underscores the importance of access to quality healthcare and highlights the need for continuous improvement in asthma management.

To visualize and interact with this data, and to explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources in Ridley Park and surrounding areas, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a powerful platform for visualizing complex healthcare data, allowing you to identify areas with high concentrations of PCPs, assess access to specialized services, and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.