19104, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19104, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.06 percent of the residents in 19104 has some form of health insurance. 31.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.71 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19104 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 11,543 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 514 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19104. An estimate of 119 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,213 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 108,651 health care providers accessible to residents in 19104, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 19104 & Primary Care Availability in Philadelphia

Philadelphia's 19104 ZIP code, encompassing a significant portion of the University City area, presents a complex landscape for asthma management. Analyzing the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) is crucial, as they often serve as the first point of contact for asthma patients, providing initial diagnoses, treatment plans, and ongoing care. This analysis will delve into the factors influencing an "Asthma Score" for this specific area, considering physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The broader context of primary care availability across Philadelphia will also be considered.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 19104 is a critical determinant of asthma care access. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed or inadequate asthma management. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and professional medical organizations must be analyzed to determine the precise ratio in 19104. This data should then be compared to citywide and national averages to assess the relative availability of PCPs in this specific ZIP code.

Identifying standout practices within 19104 is essential for understanding best practices in asthma care. These practices might demonstrate superior patient outcomes, utilize innovative treatment approaches, or excel in patient education and support. Factors to evaluate include the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, patient satisfaction scores, and the availability of specialized services like pulmonary function testing. Reviewing patient testimonials and analyzing performance metrics, if available, would provide valuable insights. Furthermore, identifying practices that actively participate in community outreach programs focused on asthma awareness and education would be highly beneficial.

Telemedicine adoption has significantly impacted healthcare access, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. Practices in 19104 that have embraced telemedicine can offer patients convenient options for follow-up appointments, medication management, and symptom monitoring. This can be especially helpful for patients with mobility limitations or those living far from the practice. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring devices), and patient satisfaction with these services, would provide valuable information for the Asthma Score.

The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is crucial. Practices in 19104 that offer on-site mental health services, referrals to mental health specialists, or utilize screening tools for mental health conditions would receive a higher score. Evaluating the availability of these resources, the training of staff in addressing mental health concerns, and the coordination between primary care and mental health providers are all vital aspects of the analysis.

Expanding the scope to consider primary care availability across Philadelphia reveals a broader context for asthma management. The city’s overall physician-to-patient ratio, the distribution of PCPs across different neighborhoods, and the availability of specialized asthma care (e.g., pulmonologists, allergists) all influence the Asthma Score for 19104. Areas with limited primary care access or significant disparities in healthcare resources can negatively impact asthma outcomes in 19104, as residents may seek care outside their immediate area, potentially increasing travel time and reducing access to consistent care.

A comprehensive Asthma Score for 19104 would integrate these factors. The score should weigh the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The score should also consider the broader context of primary care availability across Philadelphia. This score would provide a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to assess the quality and accessibility of asthma care in this specific area.

Evaluating the data requires a multi-faceted approach. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, professional medical organizations, insurance providers, and patient surveys should be analyzed. This data should be supplemented with qualitative information, such as patient testimonials and interviews with healthcare providers. Furthermore, the analysis must consider social determinants of health, such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and environmental factors, which can significantly impact asthma outcomes.

The final Asthma Score should be transparent and easily understandable. It should be presented in a clear and concise format, allowing patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare. The score should be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare availability and quality. This ongoing monitoring is essential for ensuring that asthma patients in 19104 receive the best possible care.

To visualize and further understand the complexities of healthcare access in 19104 and across Philadelphia, explore the interactive maps available from CartoChrome. These maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing data, identifying healthcare disparities, and making informed decisions about healthcare planning and resource allocation.