19107, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19107, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.34 percent of the residents in 19107 has some form of health insurance. 23.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.54 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19107 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 970 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 514 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19107. An estimate of 119 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,537 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 108,629 health care providers accessible to residents in 19107, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The asthma score analysis for doctors in ZIP code 19107, Philadelphia, and the broader primary care availability in the city requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider various factors that impact asthma management, from physician accessibility to the availability of mental health resources, all while assessing the overall quality of care provided. The analysis will be conducted in the context of Philadelphia's healthcare landscape, acknowledging its unique challenges and opportunities.

ZIP code 19107, encompassing a portion of Center City, presents a complex picture. While it benefits from proximity to major hospitals and specialist centers, the density of the population and the transient nature of some residents can create challenges in establishing consistent primary care relationships. This, in turn, can impact asthma management, which relies heavily on regular check-ups, medication adherence, and patient education.

Physician-to-patient ratios within 19107 are crucial. A higher ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Data on physician density, specifically primary care physicians and pulmonologists, is essential. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) can provide insights into these ratios. Analyzing the distribution of these physicians within the zip code and comparing it to the overall Philadelphia average offers a crucial benchmark.

Identifying standout practices within 19107 requires a deeper dive. This involves evaluating practices based on several criteria. These include the availability of asthma-specific programs, such as patient education classes or asthma action plan development. It also encompasses the incorporation of evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). Patient reviews and satisfaction scores, available through online platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, provide valuable perspectives on patient experiences. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, proactive communication, and comprehensive asthma management strategies should be recognized.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor. Telemedicine offers convenient access to care, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and asthma education. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms can potentially improve asthma control by enabling more frequent monitoring and timely interventions. The analysis should assess the availability of telemedicine services among practices in 19107, including the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring) and the ease of access for patients.

Mental health resources are inextricably linked to asthma management. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and these conditions can significantly worsen asthma symptoms and reduce treatment adherence. The analysis must consider the availability of mental health support within the primary care practices in 19107, whether through on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, or integrated behavioral health services. Practices that prioritize the mental well-being of their patients are better positioned to provide comprehensive asthma care.

Primary care availability across Philadelphia presents a broader perspective. The city, like many urban areas, faces challenges related to healthcare access, including socioeconomic disparities, transportation limitations, and insurance coverage gaps. Analyzing the distribution of primary care physicians across different zip codes is essential. This analysis should highlight areas with limited access to care, which may correlate with higher asthma prevalence and poorer asthma control.

The Philadelphia Department of Public Health and local community health centers play a vital role in addressing healthcare disparities. Their initiatives, such as mobile health clinics, outreach programs, and free or low-cost services, are crucial for reaching vulnerable populations. The analysis should assess the impact of these initiatives on asthma management, particularly in underserved communities.

The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) across primary care practices is another critical factor. EHRs facilitate data sharing, care coordination, and population health management. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively can improve asthma outcomes by tracking patient data, identifying high-risk patients, and implementing targeted interventions. The analysis should evaluate the level of EHR adoption and the extent to which EHRs are used to support asthma management in Philadelphia.

Furthermore, examining the city's public transportation infrastructure is essential. Reliable and accessible public transportation is crucial for patients to attend appointments, access medications, and participate in asthma education programs. Areas with limited transportation options may face greater challenges in accessing healthcare services. The analysis should consider the impact of transportation barriers on asthma management in different parts of Philadelphia.

In conclusion, evaluating asthma care in 19107 and Philadelphia requires a comprehensive assessment of physician accessibility, the quality of care provided, the integration of technology, and the availability of mental health and community resources. A holistic approach is needed to identify areas of strength and areas needing improvement. This includes a focus on physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health services.

For a visual and interactive exploration of the data discussed, including physician locations, patient demographics, and access to care metrics, we invite you to explore CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a dynamic platform for analyzing healthcare data, identifying patterns, and gaining a deeper understanding of asthma care in Philadelphia.