19113, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19113, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 19113 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19113 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 514 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19113. An estimate of 105 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 103,327 health care providers accessible to residents in 19113, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Analyzing asthma care within ZIP Code 19113 and assessing primary care accessibility in Philadelphia demands a multi-faceted approach, considering both quantitative metrics and qualitative factors. This analysis will generate an 'Asthma Score' ranking, incorporating physician availability, practice characteristics, and resource accessibility. The goal is to provide a clear understanding of the landscape for asthma patients and their access to primary care within this specific geographical context.

The foundation of any asthma care assessment lies in physician availability. In 19113, a crucial starting point involves calculating the physician-to-patient ratio, specifically for primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and publicly available physician directories must be cross-referenced with population data from the US Census Bureau. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to better access. However, this ratio alone is insufficient. Geographic distribution of physicians within 19113, considering factors like proximity to public transportation and the presence of underserved communities, is essential. Areas with physician “deserts” will negatively impact the Asthma Score.

Beyond raw numbers, the characteristics of primary care practices significantly influence the quality of asthma care. Practices with a demonstrated focus on asthma management, evidenced by specialized staff (e.g., certified asthma educators), comprehensive asthma action plans, and regular patient follow-up protocols, should receive higher scores. The availability of on-site spirometry and other diagnostic tools is also crucial. Practices that actively participate in asthma-related research or quality improvement initiatives further demonstrate a commitment to excellence. The Asthma Score must reflect these nuances, rewarding practices that prioritize asthma-specific care.

Telemedicine adoption represents a significant factor in improving access to care, particularly for patients with chronic conditions like asthma. Practices offering telehealth consultations, remote monitoring capabilities (e.g., peak flow meter data tracking), and virtual asthma education programs should be highly rated. Telemedicine can overcome geographical barriers, reduce travel time, and facilitate more frequent patient-physician interactions. The Asthma Score must acknowledge and reward practices embracing this technology. The ease of use of the telemedicine platform and its integration with the practice's electronic health record (EHR) system are also important considerations.

Mental health resources are inextricably linked to asthma management. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that screen for mental health issues, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health specialists should be given a higher score. The Asthma Score should reflect the importance of integrated care, recognizing that addressing mental health needs is integral to comprehensive asthma management. The availability of culturally competent mental health resources is particularly important in a diverse community like 19113.

Primary care availability across Philadelphia, beyond the confines of 19113, also affects the Asthma Score. The overall density of PCPs in the city, the availability of specialists (pulmonologists, allergists), and the ease of referral pathways all contribute to the quality of care. The presence of large hospital systems with dedicated asthma clinics and comprehensive respiratory care services positively impacts the score. The accessibility of these resources for patients residing in 19113, considering factors like insurance coverage and transportation options, is crucial.

Standout practices in 19113 deserve specific recognition. Identifying practices that consistently demonstrate excellence in asthma care, based on factors like patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines, is essential. These practices can serve as models for other providers and contribute to improving the overall quality of care in the community. Their commitment to patient education, community outreach, and collaboration with other healthcare providers should be highlighted. The Asthma Score should incorporate a mechanism for recognizing and rewarding these exemplary practices.

To calculate the Asthma Score, a weighted scoring system should be employed. Each factor – physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and overall primary care availability – should be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. Data from various sources, including physician directories, practice websites, patient surveys, and public health data, should be collected and analyzed. The final score would then be a composite of these weighted factors, providing a comprehensive assessment of asthma care quality and access in 19113.

The Asthma Score should be presented in a clear and concise manner, allowing for easy interpretation. The score could be represented numerically (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 100) or qualitatively (e.g., using letter grades). The report should include a detailed explanation of the methodology used to calculate the score, along with supporting data and analysis. This transparency is crucial for building trust and ensuring the credibility of the assessment. The report should also identify areas for improvement and recommend strategies for enhancing asthma care in 19113.

This analysis, focusing on 19113, is only a snapshot. Access to care is not static. Changes in physician availability, practice characteristics, and resource availability occur continuously. Regular updates to the Asthma Score are essential to ensure its accuracy and relevance. The data collected should be used to inform policy decisions, guide resource allocation, and support efforts to improve asthma care in the community. The goal is to empower patients with information, enabling them to make informed decisions about their healthcare and advocate for better access to quality care.

For a visual representation of this data, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping tools can visually display physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, providing a dynamic and insightful perspective on asthma care in Philadelphia and specifically within ZIP Code 19113.