19114, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19114, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.73 percent of the residents in 19114 has some form of health insurance. 39.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19114 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,730 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 517 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19114. An estimate of 108 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,868 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 104,837 health care providers accessible to residents in 19114, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts quality of life, particularly in urban environments. Understanding the availability and quality of primary care, a critical entry point for asthma management, is crucial. This analysis examines the landscape of asthma care within ZIP Code 19114 (Philadelphia) and the broader context of primary care availability across the city, focusing on key indicators like physician-to-patient ratios, innovative practice models, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 19114, and indeed across Philadelphia, presents a complex picture. While precise, up-to-the-minute data is dynamic, publicly available resources and professional organizations offer insights. Generally, urban areas often face challenges in physician distribution, with disparities potentially existing between different neighborhoods. Areas with higher concentrations of vulnerable populations, including those with a higher prevalence of asthma, may experience greater strain on available primary care resources. The overall ratio is a crucial indicator, but it doesn’t tell the whole story.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care, including its ability to effectively manage asthma, is paramount. This includes the expertise of physicians, the availability of specialized equipment for diagnosis and treatment (like spirometry), and the implementation of evidence-based asthma management protocols. Practices that prioritize patient education, self-management strategies, and regular follow-up appointments tend to achieve better outcomes for asthma patients.

Standout practices in 19114, and across Philadelphia, often differentiate themselves through a commitment to patient-centered care. This might involve extended hours, multilingual staff, or culturally sensitive approaches to care delivery. Some practices may have developed specific asthma management programs that include asthma action plans, education sessions, and regular check-ins to monitor symptom control and medication adherence. These practices frequently leverage electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, identify trends, and personalize treatment plans.

Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly impact asthma care, particularly in urban settings where access to in-person appointments can be challenging. Telehealth visits can facilitate medication refills, symptom monitoring, and educational sessions, thereby reducing the burden on patients and improving adherence to treatment plans. The successful implementation of telemedicine requires reliable internet access, patient training, and clear communication protocols. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine often report improved patient satisfaction and reduced hospital readmission rates.

The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and these conditions can worsen asthma symptoms and overall quality of life. Primary care practices that integrate mental health resources into their care models are better positioned to provide comprehensive support. This might involve on-site mental health professionals, referrals to therapists and psychiatrists, or the use of validated screening tools to identify patients who may benefit from mental health interventions. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health specialists is essential for optimal patient outcomes.

The availability of these resources varies across Philadelphia. Certain areas may have a higher concentration of practices with integrated mental health services, while others may have limited access. This disparity underscores the importance of understanding the local healthcare landscape and identifying areas where resources are most needed.

Analyzing primary care availability across Philadelphia requires a multi-faceted approach. Data from public health departments, professional organizations, and insurance providers can be used to assess physician-to-patient ratios, identify areas with limited access to care, and evaluate the quality of care provided. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be particularly useful in visualizing these data, highlighting areas with high asthma prevalence and low access to primary care.

The Asthma Score, as a concept, would incorporate a weighted assessment of these factors. It would consider physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialized asthma care resources, the integration of telemedicine, the presence of mental health support, and the implementation of evidence-based asthma management protocols. Practices would be ranked based on their performance across these indicators, providing a valuable tool for patients seeking care and for policymakers seeking to improve asthma management in Philadelphia.

Furthermore, the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) cannot be ignored. Factors like housing quality, exposure to environmental pollutants, and access to healthy food can significantly influence asthma outcomes. Practices that address SDOH through community outreach, partnerships with social service organizations, and patient education are better equipped to provide comprehensive care.

The challenge of achieving optimal asthma care in Philadelphia is multifaceted. It requires addressing disparities in access to care, improving the quality of care provided, and integrating mental health and social determinants of health into the care model. By focusing on these key areas, Philadelphia can work towards improving the lives of individuals with asthma and creating a healthier community.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 19114 and across Philadelphia, including the distribution of primary care practices, the availability of specialized resources, and the implementation of innovative care models, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Their platform allows for a visual exploration of healthcare data, empowering you to make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.