The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19127, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.37 percent of the residents in 19127 has some form of health insurance. 9.96 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 92.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19127 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 307 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19127. An estimate of 108 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 289 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 104,700 health care providers accessible to residents in 19127, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19127, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 96 |
---|---|
People Score | 55 |
Provider Score | 98 |
Hospital Score | 56 |
Travel Score | 77 |
19127 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Philadelphia (19127) & Primary Care
Analyzing asthma management within Philadelphia's 19127 ZIP code requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not only physician availability but also the broader healthcare ecosystem, including telemedicine access and mental health support. This analysis will assess the current landscape, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately, the need for improved patient outcomes.
The cornerstone of effective asthma management is accessible primary care. In Philadelphia, and specifically within 19127, the physician-to-patient ratio plays a critical role. While precise figures fluctuate, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) in this area must be carefully considered. Areas with a lower ratio, meaning fewer doctors per resident, often face challenges in timely appointments, resulting in delayed diagnoses and treatment plans. This can lead to increased asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.
Furthermore, the quality of primary care is paramount. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management through standardized protocols, patient education, and regular follow-up are crucial. These practices often utilize evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. A strong primary care network will also coordinate care with specialists, such as pulmonologists and allergists, when necessary, ensuring a holistic approach to patient well-being.
Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges in asthma care. Telehealth visits can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in areas with limited physical access to healthcare facilities. Remote monitoring technologies, such as connected spirometers and peak flow meters, can empower patients to actively manage their condition and provide valuable data to their physicians. However, the successful implementation of telemedicine relies on several factors, including reliable internet access, patient digital literacy, and appropriate reimbursement models.
Beyond the physical aspects of asthma, the impact of mental health cannot be ignored. Asthma, a chronic condition, can significantly affect a patient's emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress are common comorbidities, potentially worsening asthma symptoms and hindering adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and support groups, is critical. Integration of mental health services within primary care practices, or easy referral pathways to external resources, is a key component of comprehensive asthma management.
Evaluating the "Asthma Score" for physicians in 19127 requires a granular approach. This involves assessing the following factors: the number of PCPs actively practicing in the area, their patient load, their utilization of evidence-based asthma guidelines, their adoption of telemedicine, and their integration of mental health resources.
Identifying standout practices within 19127 is crucial. These practices often demonstrate a proactive approach to asthma management, employing a combination of the best practices. They prioritize patient education, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and actively monitor patient progress. They may also have dedicated asthma educators or nurses who provide specialized support. Furthermore, these practices will likely leverage technology to improve patient outcomes, such as electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking patient data and facilitating communication.
The primary care landscape in Philadelphia, as a whole, influences the Asthma Score for 19127. The overall availability of PCPs, the quality of care offered, and the integration of mental health services across the city contribute to the overall score. Areas with robust primary care infrastructure, comprehensive asthma management programs, and readily available mental health resources will inevitably have better outcomes for asthma patients.
Improving the Asthma Score in 19127 requires a multi-pronged strategy. This includes increasing the number of PCPs in the area, promoting the adoption of evidence-based asthma guidelines, expanding access to telemedicine services, and integrating mental health resources into primary care practices. Furthermore, community outreach programs can play a vital role in educating patients about asthma management and promoting adherence to treatment plans.
The implementation of these strategies requires collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and policymakers. Data-driven insights are essential for identifying areas of need and tracking progress. Analyzing geographic variations in asthma prevalence, access to care, and patient outcomes can help to target resources effectively.
In conclusion, assessing the Asthma Score in 19127 necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the primary care landscape, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The success of asthma management hinges on accessible, high-quality primary care, supported by technology and a holistic approach to patient well-being. The need for targeted interventions, based on data and collaborative efforts, is critical to improving outcomes for asthma patients in Philadelphia.
To visualize the geographic distribution of physicians, primary care availability, and mental health resources in 19127 and across Philadelphia, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome can provide a clear, data-driven visual representation of the healthcare landscape, enabling informed decision-making and targeted resource allocation. Explore the possibilities with CartoChrome maps to unlock valuable insights and improve asthma management in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like