19144, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19144, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.23 percent of the residents in 19144 has some form of health insurance. 50.60 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.99 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19144 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 11,311 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19144. An estimate of 90 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,728 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 96,061 health care providers accessible to residents in 19144, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts communities, demanding accessible and effective healthcare. This analysis assesses asthma care within ZIP Code 19144 (Philadelphia) and examines primary care availability across Philadelphia, focusing on factors influencing asthma management. The goal is to provide an informed perspective on the landscape of care, highlighting strengths and weaknesses to guide improvements.

ZIP Code 19144, a densely populated area, likely faces unique challenges in healthcare access. The prevalence of asthma, especially among children, is a critical concern. Analyzing the "Asthma Score" requires evaluating several key elements. Physician-to-patient ratios are paramount. A shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists can lead to delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment, and increased hospitalizations. The ideal scenario involves a sufficient number of specialists readily available to meet the community's needs. Data on the ratio of physicians to the population within 19144 provides a baseline for comparison against city and national averages.

Primary care availability across Philadelphia is also crucial. Many asthma patients rely on their PCPs for initial diagnosis, ongoing management, and medication refills. The availability of PCPs, their ability to manage asthma effectively, and their referral patterns to specialists significantly influence patient outcomes. Examining the distribution of PCPs across the city, considering factors like office hours, insurance acceptance, and language capabilities, paints a more complete picture.

Standout practices within 19144 and Philadelphia deserve recognition. Practices excelling in asthma management often demonstrate several characteristics. They may employ asthma educators, provide comprehensive patient education materials, and utilize evidence-based treatment guidelines. They might also offer convenient appointment scheduling, extended office hours, and telehealth options to improve patient access. Identifying these exemplary practices serves as a model for other providers to emulate, promoting best practices and improving the overall quality of care.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important in asthma management. Telehealth enables remote consultations, medication management, and patient education, particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. Analyzing the extent of telemedicine integration among practices in 19144 and across Philadelphia reveals the level of access to this valuable resource. Practices embracing telehealth can improve patient convenience, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance medication adherence.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but play a crucial role in asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that integrate mental health services, such as counseling or access to mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. Assessing the availability of these resources within the analyzed areas provides a more comprehensive understanding of the support systems available to asthma patients.

Specific data points are essential to create a meaningful "Asthma Score." This includes the number of PCPs and pulmonologists per capita in 19144, the average wait times for appointments, the percentage of practices offering telehealth, and the availability of asthma educators. Examining the utilization rates of emergency rooms for asthma-related issues provides insights into the effectiveness of outpatient care. Gathering information on patient satisfaction, medication adherence, and control of asthma symptoms provides a more complete picture of the quality of care.

The data gathered should be analyzed to identify trends and disparities. Are there specific areas within 19144 with limited access to care? Are certain patient populations, such as children or those with low incomes, disproportionately affected by poor asthma management? Understanding these disparities is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve access and quality of care.

A comprehensive "Asthma Score" would assign weighted values to each factor, reflecting its importance in asthma management. The physician-to-patient ratio, for example, might carry a significant weight, while the availability of mental health resources might carry a slightly lower weight. The overall score would provide a single metric reflecting the quality of asthma care in 19144 and across Philadelphia.

The analysis should also consider the impact of social determinants of health. Factors like housing quality, exposure to environmental pollutants, and socioeconomic status significantly influence asthma outcomes. Incorporating these factors into the analysis provides a more nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by asthma patients and informs the development of more effective interventions.

The final "Asthma Score" should be presented in a clear and concise manner, making it easily understandable for both healthcare professionals and the general public. The analysis should include recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of PCPs and pulmonologists, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding access to mental health resources. These recommendations should be evidence-based and tailored to the specific needs of the community.

The analysis should also highlight successful initiatives and programs. Are there any community-based programs that provide asthma education or support? Are there any partnerships between healthcare providers and community organizations to improve asthma management? Identifying and promoting these successful initiatives can help to scale up effective interventions and improve the overall quality of care.

The "Asthma Score" analysis is a dynamic process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and new information becomes available. Regular updates and revisions are necessary to ensure the analysis remains relevant and useful. This requires ongoing data collection, analysis, and evaluation.

The ultimate goal of this analysis is to improve the lives of asthma patients in 19144 and across Philadelphia. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, providing recommendations for improvement, and promoting best practices, the analysis can contribute to a more effective and equitable healthcare system.

Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape in 19144 and Philadelphia? Explore the power of geographic data with CartoChrome maps. Uncover patterns, identify disparities, and gain valuable insights into asthma care access. Visit CartoChrome today to start exploring!