19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.49 percent of the residents in 19147 has some form of health insurance. 23.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19147 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 512 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19147. An estimate of 86 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,792 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 91,179 health care providers accessible to residents in 19147, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Philadelphia's 19147 ZIP Code

This analysis delves into the asthma care landscape within Philadelphia's 19147 ZIP code, evaluating the availability and quality of primary care services, with a specific focus on asthma management. We will assess physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, explore telemedicine adoption, and examine the integration of mental health resources, ultimately aiming to provide a comprehensive “Asthma Score” assessment.

The 19147 ZIP code, encompassing areas like Point Breeze and Grays Ferry, presents a unique challenge. These neighborhoods often face socioeconomic disparities that can contribute to higher asthma prevalence rates. Factors like housing quality, environmental pollutants, and access to preventative care significantly impact asthma control. Therefore, a robust primary care infrastructure is crucial.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of access. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American Medical Association are essential to determine the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 19147. This data should be compared to city-wide and national averages to gauge the relative availability of primary care physicians. A low ratio might indicate a need for increased recruitment of healthcare professionals, or the implementation of innovative care models.

Identifying standout practices requires a multi-faceted approach. We need to consider factors beyond just the number of physicians. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management through evidence-based protocols, patient education programs, and proactive follow-up care deserve recognition. Reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, analyzing asthma-related hospitalization rates, and assessing the utilization of asthma action plans are crucial. Practices that consistently achieve positive outcomes for their asthma patients should be highlighted as models for others to emulate.

Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool for expanding access to care, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. The adoption of telemedicine within 19147 is a key factor in our Asthma Score. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online patient education programs can significantly improve asthma control. Telemedicine can overcome geographical barriers, reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, and provide timely interventions, particularly during asthma exacerbations. The availability of telehealth services, the types of services offered, and patient uptake of these technologies will contribute to the overall assessment.

The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is essential. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, have established referral pathways to mental health specialists, or utilize collaborative care models that involve both primary care physicians and mental health professionals, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. The presence and accessibility of these resources will be a significant factor in the Asthma Score.

Primary care availability across Philadelphia as a whole is also relevant. The overall capacity of the city's healthcare system impacts the resources available to 19147 residents. Analyzing the distribution of primary care physicians across the city, identifying areas with physician shortages, and evaluating initiatives to improve access to care across the city are important considerations. The Asthma Score should reflect the context of primary care availability within the broader Philadelphia landscape.

To calculate the Asthma Score for 19147, we would need to assign weighted values to each of the factors discussed. Physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care at standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources would all be assigned points. The final score would reflect the overall quality of asthma care available within the ZIP code.

This analysis is a starting point. A more comprehensive assessment would require detailed data collection, including data from primary care practices, patient surveys, and public health records. The availability of this data, and the ability to analyze it, are essential to accurately evaluate the asthma care landscape.

The Asthma Score should be a dynamic measure, constantly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. Regular monitoring and evaluation are crucial to identify areas for improvement and to ensure that residents of 19147 have access to the best possible asthma care.

Ultimately, the goal is to improve asthma outcomes and reduce the burden of this chronic disease on the residents of 19147. By assessing the current state of care, identifying areas for improvement, and promoting best practices, we can work towards a healthier community.

For a visual representation of the data, including physician locations, areas with high asthma prevalence, and the availability of resources, consider exploring the dynamic mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a powerful and interactive way to understand the complexities of asthma care in Philadelphia.