19345, Immaculata, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19345, Immaculata, Pennsylvania is 80 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 66.97 percent of the residents in 19345 has some form of health insurance. 10.65 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19345 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 88 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19345. An estimate of 7 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 26 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 12,400 health care providers accessible to residents in 19345, Immaculata, Pennsylvania.

Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 19345 and Primary Care Availability in Immaculata

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 19345, which encompasses Immaculata, Pennsylvania, requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), the specific resources dedicated to asthma management, and the broader context of healthcare access, including telemedicine and mental health support. This analysis will culminate in an "Asthma Score" assessment, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of care for asthma patients in this area.

The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning a higher number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially less individualized care. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests better access to timely consultations and ongoing management. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) can provide insights into these ratios. However, these figures often represent broader county or regional averages and may not accurately reflect the specific situation within 19345. Local healthcare networks and hospitals are crucial sources for more granular data, including physician availability and patient load.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Does the practice have a dedicated asthma management protocol? Are physicians well-versed in current asthma guidelines, including the use of inhaled corticosteroids, rescue inhalers, and peak flow meters? Do they offer patient education on triggers, medication adherence, and emergency action plans? These are all essential components of comprehensive asthma care.

Identifying standout practices within 19345 requires examining patient reviews, practice websites, and potentially contacting local healthcare advocacy groups. Practices that emphasize patient education, offer extended hours, and have a demonstrated commitment to asthma management should be highlighted. Furthermore, the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) is a positive indicator, allowing for better coordination of care and easier access to patient information.

Telemedicine has rapidly transformed healthcare delivery, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Its adoption within 19345 is crucial for asthma patients. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of symptoms. This is especially beneficial for patients who live in rural areas or have mobility issues. Practices that offer telemedicine options should be given a higher score, as they demonstrate a commitment to expanding access to care. The availability of telehealth services for follow-up appointments and medication management can significantly improve asthma control and reduce the need for emergency room visits.

Mental health is inextricably linked to physical health, and asthma patients are no exception. The chronic nature of asthma can lead to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals is a significant factor in assessing the quality of care. Practices that integrate mental health screening and offer access to therapists or counselors receive a higher score. This can include on-site mental health professionals or partnerships with local mental health providers.

The "Asthma Score" for 19345 will reflect a composite of these factors. It's not a single number but a nuanced assessment. A high score would indicate: a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, primary care practices with dedicated asthma management protocols, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. A lower score would suggest the opposite: limited access to PCPs, practices lacking specific asthma management programs, minimal telemedicine options, and inadequate mental health support.

To determine the specific "Asthma Score" for the area, we would need to gather data from various sources. This includes: physician directories, patient reviews, insurance provider information, and local healthcare organizations. The analysis would involve a detailed assessment of each practice, considering its resources, services, and patient outcomes.

The availability of specialists, such as pulmonologists and allergists, is also important. While PCPs provide the foundation of asthma care, specialist referrals are often necessary for complex cases or for patients who are not responding to standard treatments. The proximity of these specialists and the ease of referral pathways are crucial factors to consider.

Another factor to consider is the affordability of care. The cost of healthcare, including doctor visits, medications, and diagnostic tests, can significantly impact access to care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer financial assistance programs should be recognized.

Furthermore, community resources, such as asthma support groups and educational programs, can play a vital role in asthma management. These resources provide patients with valuable information, peer support, and coping strategies.

In conclusion, assessing the quality of asthma care in 19345 requires a comprehensive evaluation of primary care availability, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the overall accessibility and affordability of care. A high "Asthma Score" indicates a healthcare environment that is well-equipped to meet the needs of asthma patients, while a lower score suggests areas for improvement.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 19345 and beyond, we invite you to explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide valuable insights into physician locations, healthcare resource availability, and other relevant data points.