19523, Geigertown, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19523, Geigertown, Pennsylvania is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 19523 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19523 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19523. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,782 health care providers accessible to residents in 19523, Geigertown, Pennsylvania.

The asthma score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 19523 and primary care availability in Geigertown, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach, considering various factors that contribute to effective asthma management. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and explore the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of this specific geographic area.

ZIP Code 19523, encompassing Geigertown and its surrounding areas, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities regarding healthcare access. The primary concern is the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, who are crucial for asthma diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potentially poorer health outcomes for asthma sufferers. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the US Census Bureau, combined with information from healthcare directories and insurance provider networks, would be necessary to determine the exact ratio within 19523. This data would reveal the density of healthcare providers and identify potential gaps in service.

Analyzing the practices within the ZIP code requires a deeper dive. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several key metrics. First, the quality of asthma care, measured through patient satisfaction surveys, adherence to national asthma guidelines (e.g., those from the National Institutes of Health), and the use of evidence-based treatments. Second, the accessibility of care, including appointment availability, extended hours, and the acceptance of various insurance plans. Third, the utilization of technology, such as electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data management and communication. Practices that demonstrate excellence in these areas would be considered top performers and serve as models for others.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations and remote monitoring can significantly improve asthma management, especially for patients with chronic conditions or those living in geographically isolated areas. Telemedicine can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, improve medication adherence, and provide timely interventions to prevent exacerbations. The analysis would assess the extent to which practices in 19523 offer telemedicine services, including the types of services available (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring of lung function), the ease of access to these services, and the patient satisfaction with telemedicine experiences.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are an integral part of asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The analysis must evaluate the availability of mental health services within the community, including access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. It is crucial to assess whether primary care practices and specialists have established referral pathways to mental health providers and whether they routinely screen patients for mental health concerns. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health professionals is essential for providing comprehensive care.

The specific practices within 19523 would be examined for their approach to asthma management. This includes the use of spirometry to assess lung function, the development of personalized asthma action plans, and patient education on triggers, medications, and self-management techniques. The analysis would also assess the use of inhaled corticosteroids and other medications, the frequency of exacerbations, and the overall control of asthma symptoms. The adoption of innovative approaches, such as home-based asthma monitoring programs or the use of mobile health apps, would also be considered.

The analysis would also consider the demographics of the population served by the practices in 19523. This includes factors such as age, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage. Asthma disproportionately affects certain populations, and understanding these demographics is essential for identifying disparities in care and developing targeted interventions. The analysis would assess whether practices are culturally competent and provide services that are tailored to the needs of diverse patient populations.

Furthermore, the analysis would consider the role of community resources in supporting asthma management. This includes access to asthma education programs, support groups, and environmental health initiatives. Collaboration between healthcare providers, schools, and community organizations is essential for creating a comprehensive approach to asthma care. The analysis would assess the extent to which practices in 19523 are involved in community outreach and education efforts.

The analysis would also consider the impact of environmental factors on asthma prevalence and severity. This includes air quality, allergens, and other environmental triggers. The analysis would assess the availability of information on air quality and pollen counts, and the extent to which practices educate patients on how to avoid environmental triggers. Collaboration with local environmental agencies would be considered a positive attribute.

The final asthma score would be a composite measure, incorporating all the factors discussed above. The score would reflect the overall quality, accessibility, and comprehensiveness of asthma care in ZIP Code 19523. The score would be used to identify areas of strength and weakness and to inform recommendations for improvement. The analysis would provide a valuable resource for healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers in the Geigertown area.

To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 19523, including the location of practices, the distribution of healthcare providers, and the availability of resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that visualize healthcare data, allowing you to explore the area and identify potential gaps in care.