The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19601, Reading, Pennsylvania is 71 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 88.66 percent of the residents in 19601 has some form of health insurance. 58.54 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 39.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19601 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 11,392 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19601. An estimate of 25 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,900 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,743 health care providers accessible to residents in 19601, Reading, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19601, Reading, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 19 |
---|---|
People Score | 2 |
Provider Score | 71 |
Hospital Score | 35 |
Travel Score | 36 |
19601 | Reading | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Reading, PA (ZIP Code 19601)
Reading, Pennsylvania, and specifically the 19601 ZIP code, presents a complex landscape for asthma management. Analyzing the quality of care for asthma sufferers requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not only the physicians available but also the accessibility of primary care, the adoption of innovative technologies, and the integration of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, evaluating the current situation and identifying areas for improvement.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on the availability of qualified physicians. In ZIP code 19601, the physician-to-patient ratio for specialists, specifically pulmonologists and allergists, is a critical factor. While precise figures fluctuate, anecdotal evidence and publicly available data suggest a potential shortage. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment adjustments. Patients may be forced to travel outside the immediate area, increasing the burden on those with asthma.
Primary care physicians (PCPs) play a vital role in asthma care. They are often the first point of contact for patients and are responsible for initial diagnosis, ongoing monitoring, and medication management. The availability of PCPs in Reading is crucial. Assessing this requires considering the number of PCPs per capita, their acceptance of new patients, and their ability to provide comprehensive asthma care. A shortage of PCPs can exacerbate the strain on specialists and lead to fragmented care, potentially resulting in poorer asthma control.
Identifying standout practices within the 19601 ZIP code is essential. These practices often demonstrate best practices in asthma management. They might be characterized by a patient-centered approach, incorporating comprehensive asthma action plans, regular patient education, and proactive monitoring of symptoms. They might also excel in coordinating care with specialists and providing easy access to appointments and prescription refills. These practices serve as models for others to emulate, contributing to a higher overall standard of care.
Telemedicine offers a promising avenue for improving asthma care, particularly in areas with limited access to specialists. The adoption of telemedicine technologies, such as virtual consultations and remote monitoring devices, can provide patients with convenient access to medical advice and support. This is especially beneficial for patients with frequent exacerbations or those living in underserved areas. The extent to which practices in 19601 have embraced telemedicine is a key indicator of their commitment to patient care and their ability to adapt to evolving healthcare models.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and these conditions can significantly impact asthma control. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists and psychiatrists, within the primary care setting or through referral networks, is a crucial component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma management programs are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients.
Evaluating the Asthma Score requires assessing these factors in combination. A high score would indicate a strong physician-to-patient ratio, readily available primary care, standout practices implementing best practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health resources. Conversely, a low score would reflect shortages in physician availability, limited access to primary care, a lack of innovative approaches, and insufficient integration of mental health services.
The specific practices and healthcare providers within the 19601 ZIP code must be evaluated individually. This assessment involves gathering data on physician availability, patient wait times, the availability of specialized services, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. Publicly available data from sources such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and patient reviews can be used to inform this assessment.
Furthermore, the Asthma Score should consider the socioeconomic factors prevalent in Reading. Poverty, lack of access to quality housing, and environmental pollution can disproportionately affect asthma sufferers. Practices located in areas with higher rates of poverty and pollution may require additional resources and support to provide effective asthma care.
The assessment of primary care availability must go beyond simple physician-to-patient ratios. It is crucial to consider the acceptance of new patients, the availability of same-day appointments, and the ability of PCPs to provide comprehensive asthma care. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, and convenient access to prescription refills can significantly improve the patient experience and contribute to better asthma control.
The integration of patient education is another critical factor. Practices should provide patients with clear and concise information about their asthma, including trigger avoidance, medication management, and the use of asthma action plans. Patient education can empower individuals to take control of their asthma and improve their quality of life.
The use of electronic health records (EHRs) is also important. EHRs can facilitate communication between healthcare providers, improve the accuracy of patient records, and enable better tracking of patient outcomes. Practices that utilize EHRs effectively are better positioned to provide coordinated and comprehensive asthma care.
Ultimately, the Asthma Score is a dynamic measure that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. As new technologies emerge and best practices evolve, the assessment criteria must be refined to ensure that it accurately reflects the quality of asthma care in the 19601 ZIP code. The goal is to identify areas for improvement and to promote the delivery of high-quality, patient-centered asthma care.
To gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Reading, PA, and visualize the factors impacting asthma care, explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their data visualization tools can provide valuable insights into physician availability, access to primary care, and other relevant factors.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like