The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19605, Reading, Pennsylvania is 71 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.04 percent of the residents in 19605 has some form of health insurance. 38.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19605 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,461 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19605. An estimate of 25 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,816 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,717 health care providers accessible to residents in 19605, Reading, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 19605, Reading, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 66 |
---|---|
People Score | 30 |
Provider Score | 71 |
Hospital Score | 40 |
Travel Score | 74 |
19605 | Reading | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The health landscape of Reading, Pennsylvania, specifically within the 19605 ZIP code, presents a complex picture when analyzing asthma care and primary care accessibility. An "Asthma Score," if one were to be developed, would need to consider a multitude of factors, from physician density and specialization to the availability of ancillary services and the integration of mental health support. Evaluating these elements provides a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities for individuals managing asthma within this specific geographic area.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. In 19605, the density of primary care physicians and pulmonologists directly impacts access to care. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments for asthma sufferers. Conversely, a higher ratio implies greater availability, potentially leading to better outcomes. This ratio must be considered alongside the prevalence of asthma within the community, which is often higher in urban areas and communities with socioeconomic disadvantages.
Primary care availability in Reading, and by extension within 19605, extends beyond the mere number of physicians. The ability to secure appointments promptly, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the cultural competency of the medical staff all contribute to accessibility. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, or same-day urgent care services significantly enhance access for patients, especially those with unpredictable asthma symptoms.
Standout practices within the 19605 area would likely be those demonstrating a comprehensive approach to asthma management. This includes not only providing medical expertise but also offering patient education, asthma action plans, and regular follow-up appointments. Practices that actively engage in community outreach programs, educating the public about asthma triggers and management strategies, would also be highly regarded. Practices that prioritize patient communication, offering clear explanations and answering questions thoroughly, are likely to foster better patient adherence to treatment plans.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. The ability to consult with a physician remotely, particularly for follow-up appointments or medication adjustments, can be a significant benefit for asthma patients. Telemedicine reduces the need for travel, saving time and potentially reducing exposure to environmental triggers. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring of patients' symptoms, would score favorably in an asthma care evaluation.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as a critical component of asthma management. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that provide access to mental health professionals, either on-site or through referrals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. This integration can improve patient outcomes by addressing the psychological aspects of asthma, leading to better adherence to treatment plans and improved quality of life.
The socioeconomic factors of the Reading area also play a significant role in asthma care. The availability of affordable medications, access to specialized care, and the presence of environmental triggers such as air pollution and substandard housing conditions all impact the severity and management of asthma. Practices that are actively involved in community advocacy, working to address these social determinants of health, would likely be seen as exemplary.
Analyzing the Asthma Score within 19605 requires a detailed understanding of the resources available. This includes the number of board-certified pulmonologists, the availability of allergy testing and treatment, and the presence of respiratory therapists and asthma educators. Practices that have invested in advanced diagnostic equipment, such as spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide testing, would be well-positioned to provide comprehensive asthma care.
The role of hospitals and emergency rooms cannot be ignored. The proximity and accessibility of hospitals with specialized respiratory care units are essential for managing severe asthma exacerbations. The ability to quickly access emergency care, coupled with the availability of asthma-specific protocols, can significantly improve patient outcomes.
In conclusion, assessing the "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP code 19605 and primary care availability in Reading is a multifaceted undertaking. The score should reflect the physician-to-patient ratios, the accessibility of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the practice's commitment to patient education and community outreach. The socioeconomic factors of the area, as well as the availability of specialized respiratory care, also play a significant role.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape within 19605 and Reading, including the distribution of physicians, hospitals, and community resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their interactive maps provide a valuable tool for visualizing and analyzing the data, allowing for a more informed assessment of asthma care and primary care availability in the area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like