02813, Charlestown, Rhode Island Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02813, Charlestown, Rhode Island is 68 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.53 percent of the residents in 02813 has some form of health insurance. 35.03 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02813 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,227 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02813. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,904 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 392 health care providers accessible to residents in 02813, Charlestown, Rhode Island.

Analyzing asthma care within ZIP code 02813, and evaluating primary care access in Charlestown, requires a multi-faceted approach. We'll construct an "Asthma Score" to assess the quality and accessibility of care, focusing on physician availability, innovative practices, and supporting resources. This analysis will then provide a framework for understanding the current landscape and identifying areas for improvement.

The foundation of any asthma care assessment lies in the availability of qualified healthcare professionals. In ZIP code 02813, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio for primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists is crucial. A low ratio, indicating more physicians per patient, generally suggests better access to care, shorter wait times for appointments, and potentially more personalized attention. Data on the specific number of PCPs and pulmonologists practicing within the zip code, and the estimated patient population, is essential to calculating this ratio. Public health data from sources like the Rhode Island Department of Health or the US Census Bureau can be used to gather this information.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. This involves evaluating the practices themselves. Are there any standout practices in 02813 known for their expertise in asthma management? Identifying practices that utilize evidence-based guidelines, offer comprehensive asthma education programs, and actively engage patients in their care plans is vital. These practices often demonstrate superior outcomes, including fewer asthma exacerbations, reduced hospitalizations, and improved quality of life for patients. Information regarding patient satisfaction, as reported through surveys or online reviews, can further inform the assessment.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor in the Asthma Score. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can significantly improve asthma management, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices that offer telemedicine options, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments, should receive a higher score. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters with digital connectivity, allows for proactive management and early intervention, further enhancing the score.

Mental health considerations are frequently overlooked in asthma care, yet they are critically important. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that integrate mental health resources into their asthma care programs, such as offering on-site counseling or referrals to mental health professionals, should be highly regarded. This integrated approach acknowledges the holistic needs of patients and can lead to better overall outcomes.

Now, shifting focus to primary care availability in Charlestown, the analysis must address similar factors. The physician-to-patient ratio in Charlestown requires careful examination. Charlestown's demographics and geographical layout may influence access to care. Is the town primarily served by a single large practice, or are there multiple smaller practices? Are there any urgent care facilities that offer primary care services?

The physical location of primary care practices in Charlestown is also relevant. Easy access to care is vital, especially for patients with chronic conditions like asthma. Practices located near public transportation or with ample parking facilities will likely score higher. The availability of extended hours and weekend appointments can also increase accessibility, particularly for working individuals.

Evaluating the practices in Charlestown involves looking at the same factors as in 02813. Do these practices employ evidence-based guidelines for asthma management? Do they offer patient education programs? Do they have a track record of positive patient outcomes? The presence of a dedicated asthma nurse or respiratory therapist within the practice can significantly improve the quality of care.

Telemedicine adoption in Charlestown is equally important. The ability to access virtual consultations and remote monitoring can improve access to care, especially for patients living in rural areas or with mobility issues. Practices that have embraced telehealth are better positioned to provide accessible and convenient care.

Finally, the availability of mental health resources in Charlestown is a critical factor. Primary care practices that have established partnerships with mental health professionals or offer in-house counseling services demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. This integrated approach can lead to better asthma control and improved overall well-being.

To summarize, the Asthma Score for both 02813 and Charlestown is based on a composite of factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by individual practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources are all important considerations. The final score reflects the overall accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of asthma care in each location. This score can be used to compare different areas, identify areas for improvement, and guide patients in their search for the best possible care.

Understanding the complex interplay of these factors is essential for creating a comprehensive and accurate assessment of asthma care. This analysis highlights the importance of considering not just the availability of physicians, but also the quality of care, the use of technology, and the integration of mental health resources. By taking a holistic approach, we can better understand the challenges and opportunities in asthma care and work towards improving the lives of patients.

For a visual representation of this data, including the locations of practices, physician-to-patient ratios, and other relevant factors, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful and intuitive way to visualize complex healthcare data, making it easier to understand the landscape of asthma care in your community.