The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02837, Little Compton, Rhode Island is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.22 percent of the residents in 02837 has some form of health insurance. 39.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 83.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02837 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 455 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02837. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,234 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,275 health care providers accessible to residents in 02837, Little Compton, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02837, Little Compton, Rhode Island
Asthma Score | 80 |
---|---|
People Score | 82 |
Provider Score | 54 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 49 |
02837 | Little Compton | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below focuses on asthma care within ZIP code 02837 (Little Compton, Rhode Island), examining primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, all factors influencing an "Asthma Score" for the area. This score, though not a formally recognized metric, serves as a composite indicator of the accessibility and quality of asthma management.
Little Compton, a small coastal community, presents a unique healthcare landscape. Its rural nature often translates to challenges in healthcare access, particularly for specialized care. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is the cornerstone of asthma management. Regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education are critical for controlling the condition. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access. However, this metric alone is insufficient. It needs to be considered alongside the age and health profile of the population. Little Compton's demographics, with a significant older population, likely have a higher prevalence of chronic respiratory conditions like asthma. This increased demand further strains the available resources.
Assessing the "Asthma Score" requires evaluating the practices within the ZIP code. Identifying standout practices involves looking beyond the raw number of physicians. Practices that demonstrate a proactive approach to asthma management, such as offering comprehensive asthma action plans, providing patient education materials, and having dedicated asthma educators, would score higher. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, track patient outcomes, and utilize evidence-based guidelines would also receive higher marks. These practices are better equipped to provide the necessary ongoing care.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers significant advantages in rural areas, overcoming geographical barriers and increasing access to care. For asthma patients, virtual consultations can be valuable for medication adjustments, monitoring symptoms, and providing education. Practices that offer telemedicine services for asthma management would contribute positively to the "Asthma Score." The ability to remotely monitor patients' peak flow readings or provide virtual asthma education classes can significantly improve asthma control.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as a vital component of asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. Practices that provide access to mental health professionals, either within the practice or through referrals, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. This integration is particularly important in managing asthma exacerbations, as stress can trigger or worsen symptoms. The availability of these resources directly impacts the "Asthma Score."
Evaluating the specific practices in Little Compton, the analysis needs to go beyond a simple count of physicians. Researching each practice's website, patient reviews, and publicly available information about their services is essential. This includes assessing the availability of after-hours care, which is crucial for managing asthma exacerbations. Practices with extended hours or partnerships with urgent care facilities would contribute positively to the "Asthma Score." The presence of specialized equipment, such as spirometry, is another factor to consider.
The "Asthma Score" also hinges on the availability of ancillary services. Access to respiratory therapists, pulmonary specialists, and allergists is crucial for comprehensive asthma management. The proximity of these specialists and the ease of referral pathways significantly impact the score. If patients need to travel long distances for specialist care, the "Asthma Score" would be negatively affected.
The overall "Asthma Score" for Little Compton, therefore, is a complex measure reflecting the interplay of several factors. The physician-to-patient ratio is a starting point, but it must be considered in the context of the practice's approach to asthma management, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and access to specialist care. The availability of patient education materials, asthma action plans, and proactive monitoring programs are all crucial components.
Furthermore, the "Asthma Score" is not static. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare providers, telemedicine capabilities, and the availability of resources. Regular monitoring of patient outcomes and patient satisfaction is also essential to assess the effectiveness of asthma management efforts.
The evaluation of primary care availability in Little Compton also needs to consider the impact of health insurance. The acceptance of various insurance plans by local practices is a critical factor in determining access to care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicare and Medicaid, would contribute to a higher "Asthma Score." The availability of financial assistance programs for patients who cannot afford their medications is also a factor.
In conclusion, assessing the "Asthma Score" for Little Compton involves a comprehensive analysis of multiple factors, including physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and access to specialist care. This analysis requires a thorough understanding of the local healthcare landscape and a commitment to providing high-quality asthma management.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Little Compton, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, explore the power of geographic data with CartoChrome maps. See how location impacts healthcare access and discover the insights you need to make informed decisions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like