02882, Narragansett, Rhode Island Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02882, Narragansett, Rhode Island is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.82 percent of the residents in 02882 has some form of health insurance. 32.05 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.32 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02882 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,524 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02882. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,371 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,165 health care providers accessible to residents in 02882, Narragansett, Rhode Island.

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts quality of life. Effective management hinges on accessible, high-quality primary care. This analysis explores the landscape of asthma care within ZIP Code 02882 (Narragansett, Rhode Island), focusing on primary care physician availability and related resources. We will assess the ‘Asthma Score’ based on various factors.

Evaluating physician-to-patient ratios is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can hinder access to timely appointments and ongoing care, potentially worsening asthma control. While precise, real-time physician counts fluctuate, publicly available data from sources like the Rhode Island Department of Health and the American Medical Association provides estimates. We must consider the total population of Narragansett and the number of practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP code, including family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatricians. A higher ratio is generally more favorable, signifying better access.

Standout practices are identified through several indicators. Patient reviews, available on platforms like Healthgrades and Vitals, provide insights into patient satisfaction, communication, and the overall experience. Practices that consistently receive positive feedback, particularly regarding asthma management, are considered high-performing. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in asthma-specific quality improvement programs, such as those offered by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) or the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based care.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important. Telehealth offers a convenient and accessible option for routine follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education, especially beneficial for individuals with chronic conditions like asthma. Practices that offer telehealth services, including video consultations and remote monitoring, are awarded higher scores. The ease of scheduling and the availability of telehealth options are crucial factors.

Mental health resources are integral to asthma management. Asthma and mental health often intersect. Anxiety and depression can worsen asthma symptoms, and conversely, the physical limitations of asthma can contribute to mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referral services, either through in-house therapists or partnerships with mental health providers, receive a higher score. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals ensures a holistic approach to patient care.

The ‘Asthma Score’ is not a single, definitive number. Instead, it is a composite assessment based on the factors discussed. A practice receives points in each category: physician-to-patient ratio, patient satisfaction, participation in quality improvement programs, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources.

For physician-to-patient ratio, a higher ratio (more physicians per capita) contributes positively to the score. Practices with demonstrably high patient satisfaction scores, based on patient reviews and surveys, receive a boost. Active participation in asthma-specific quality improvement programs, such as those provided by the NCQA, earns additional points. Practices that offer telehealth services, including video consultations and remote monitoring, gain a higher score. Finally, practices that incorporate mental health screening and referral services, either internally or through partnerships, also increase their score.

The overall ‘Asthma Score’ for primary care in Narragansett (ZIP Code 02882) is a complex calculation. Based on publicly available data and general observations, we can offer a preliminary assessment. The physician-to-patient ratio in Narragansett, while subject to change, may be moderately favorable, but further investigation is needed to confirm this. Patient satisfaction, as reflected in online reviews, appears to be generally positive, but individual experiences vary.

Telemedicine adoption is likely present to some degree, especially given the broader trends in healthcare. However, the extent of telehealth utilization specifically for asthma management requires further investigation. The integration of mental health resources may vary among practices. Some practices may have established referral pathways, while others may not.

Overall, the ‘Asthma Score’ for primary care in Narragansett is likely to be in the moderate to good range. The availability of primary care physicians, coupled with positive patient feedback, suggests a reasonable level of access and quality. However, the specific level of telemedicine adoption and the degree of integration of mental health resources are key areas for further evaluation.

The best practices in Narragansett likely demonstrate a commitment to providing comprehensive asthma care. They may offer convenient appointment scheduling, actively engage in quality improvement initiatives, and integrate mental health support. The practices that excel in these areas are the ones that are likely to achieve the highest ‘Asthma Score’ and deliver the best outcomes for their patients.

For individuals seeking primary care in Narragansett with a focus on asthma management, it is important to research individual practices. Consider patient reviews, inquire about telehealth options, and ask about the availability of mental health resources. Discuss the practice’s approach to asthma management, including medication management, patient education, and follow-up care.

The ‘Asthma Score’ is a dynamic assessment. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in physician availability, practice improvements, and evolving healthcare trends. The ongoing assessment ensures that patients have access to the most current and accurate information.

To gain a more detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape in Narragansett and other areas, consider exploring interactive mapping tools. These tools allow you to visualize physician locations, access demographic data, and analyze healthcare resources. They can provide valuable insights into the accessibility and availability of care.

For a comprehensive, interactive map of healthcare resources in Narragansett and beyond, including physician locations, practice details, and demographic data, explore CartoChrome maps.