The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 02919, Johnston, Rhode Island is 94 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.72 percent of the residents in 02919 has some form of health insurance. 36.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.18 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02919 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 5,664 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 11 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02919. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,022 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,616 health care providers accessible to residents in 02919, Johnston, Rhode Island.
Health Scores in 02919, Johnston, Rhode Island
Asthma Score | 54 |
---|---|
People Score | 23 |
Provider Score | 94 |
Hospital Score | 7 |
Travel Score | 74 |
02919 | Johnston | Rhode Island | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management, a critical component of public health, demands a multifaceted approach. This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within ZIP Code 02919 (likely a portion of Providence, Rhode Island) and assesses the availability of primary care in Johnston, Rhode Island, evaluating key factors influencing patient outcomes. We will use an “Asthma Score” framework, though not a numerical one, to gauge the quality and accessibility of care.
**Asthma Score Analysis: ZIP Code 02919**
The provision of asthma care in 02919 hinges on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. A higher ratio, implying more patients per doctor, can strain resources and potentially limit appointment availability and the time physicians can dedicate to each patient. We will consider the presence of board-certified pulmonologists and allergists within and near the zip code. Access to these specialists is vital for complex asthma cases and for accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Standout practices demonstrate a commitment to asthma management through several key features. These include the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, and readily available resources. We look for practices that routinely assess asthma control using standardized questionnaires, personalize treatment plans based on individual needs, and proactively address environmental triggers. A practice that actively monitors patient adherence to medication regimens and provides support to overcome barriers to care will receive a higher score.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly significant, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. Practices that offer telehealth consultations for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and asthma education can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. The ease of access to telehealth services, including the availability of virtual visits and remote monitoring tools, will be a key factor in our evaluation.
The interplay between asthma and mental health is well-documented. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms, and conversely, managing asthma can be stressful. Practices that integrate mental health resources into their asthma care programs demonstrate a comprehensive approach. This includes screening for mental health conditions, offering counseling services, or collaborating with mental health professionals. The availability of these resources will significantly impact the overall asthma score.
**Asthma Score Analysis: Primary Care Availability in Johnston**
Primary care availability in Johnston is critical, as PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for asthma patients. The number of PCPs per capita is a fundamental measure. A higher density of PCPs generally translates to easier access to care, shorter wait times for appointments, and potentially more comprehensive care coordination. We will assess the overall availability of primary care within Johnston and its surrounding areas, including the acceptance of new patients and the hours of operation.
The geographical distribution of primary care practices within Johnston is another factor. Are practices evenly distributed, or are there areas with limited access? We will consider the proximity of practices to residential areas, public transportation, and community resources. Practices located in areas with high-risk populations, such as those with a higher prevalence of asthma or socioeconomic disadvantages, will be viewed favorably.
The integration of asthma management into primary care practices is a critical aspect. We will evaluate whether PCPs are trained in asthma management, routinely assess asthma control, and provide patient education on asthma triggers and medication adherence. The availability of asthma action plans and the coordination of care with specialists will be assessed.
The use of electronic health records (EHRs) can improve care coordination and facilitate the sharing of information between PCPs and specialists. Practices that utilize EHRs to track asthma control, medication use, and patient outcomes will be considered to have a higher score. The ability to easily access and share patient information is essential for effective asthma management.
**Conclusion**
Evaluating asthma care requires a comprehensive assessment of various factors, from physician availability and specialist access to the integration of telehealth and mental health resources. The “Asthma Score” framework, as described above, provides a holistic perspective on the quality and accessibility of care in both ZIP Code 02919 and Johnston. While this analysis provides a general overview, the specifics of each practice and the evolving healthcare landscape necessitate ongoing evaluation.
To visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare providers, analyze patient demographics, and explore the various factors that influence asthma care, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations and powerful analytical tools to gain deeper insights into the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like