The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 29042, Denmark, South Carolina is 8 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 80.81 percent of the residents in 29042 has some form of health insurance. 44.42 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.50 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29042 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,268 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29042. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 698 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 693 health care providers accessible to residents in 29042, Denmark, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29042, Denmark, South Carolina
Asthma Score | 1 |
---|---|
People Score | 10 |
Provider Score | 8 |
Hospital Score | 26 |
Travel Score | 14 |
29042 | Denmark | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29042 and Primary Care Availability in Denmark, South Carolina
This analysis evaluates the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Denmark, South Carolina (ZIP Code 29042), focusing on factors relevant to asthma management, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide an 'Asthma Score' assessment, reflecting the ease with which asthma patients can access comprehensive and supportive care within this specific geographic area.
Denmark, a small town in Bamberg County, presents unique challenges and opportunities regarding healthcare access. Rural communities often face difficulties in attracting and retaining healthcare professionals, potentially leading to lower physician-to-patient ratios and limited specialized services. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, requires consistent monitoring, medication management, and patient education, making access to quality primary care crucial.
The physician-to-patient ratio in 29042 is a critical indicator of accessibility. Data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) will be consulted to determine the current ratio. A lower ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. However, the mere presence of physicians doesn't guarantee quality. The analysis will delve into the types of PCPs available, including family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatricians, as each may offer different levels of asthma expertise.
Identifying standout practices involves assessing several factors. These include the availability of board-certified physicians, the implementation of evidence-based asthma management guidelines, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate a commitment to patient education will be highly regarded. Examining online reviews and patient testimonials, while acknowledging their limitations, can provide valuable insights into patient experiences.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect of the Asthma Score. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas who may face transportation challenges. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of asthma symptoms, and online patient portals will be viewed favorably. The ability to connect with specialists remotely can also be a significant advantage for asthma patients. This is especially important for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and addressing acute exacerbations.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as essential in managing chronic conditions like asthma. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and untreated mental health issues can negatively impact asthma control. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals, will receive higher scores. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups.
The Asthma Score will also consider the availability of ancillary services that support asthma management. This includes access to respiratory therapists, certified asthma educators, and pharmacies that offer convenient medication refills. The presence of these resources within the community can significantly improve patient outcomes. The proximity of specialty care, such as pulmonologists, is also a factor, although access to specialists may be limited in a rural setting.
Data collection will involve a combination of methods. Publicly available data from government agencies, such as DHEC and HRSA, will be used to determine physician-to-patient ratios and identify healthcare providers. Online searches and practice websites will be used to gather information on services offered, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. Patient reviews and testimonials will be analyzed to assess patient satisfaction. Direct contact with healthcare providers may be necessary to gather more detailed information.
The final Asthma Score will be a composite score, reflecting the weighted importance of each factor. The weighting will be based on the impact of each factor on asthma management and patient outcomes. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and access to mental health resources may be weighted more heavily than the availability of online patient portals.
The analysis will consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on healthcare access. Denmark, like many rural communities, may have a higher proportion of low-income residents and individuals with limited access to transportation. The Asthma Score will take these factors into account, recognizing that patients with limited resources may face additional barriers to accessing care.
The analysis will also acknowledge the limitations of the data. Data availability may vary, and some information may be difficult to obtain. Patient reviews and testimonials may be biased. The Asthma Score will be presented with a clear understanding of its limitations and will be intended as a general assessment of healthcare access and quality in 29042.
The findings of this analysis will provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of primary care availability in Denmark, South Carolina, concerning asthma management. The analysis will identify areas where improvements are needed and highlight best practices. The ultimate goal is to contribute to improved healthcare access and outcomes for asthma patients in this community. The assessment will be a dynamic one, recognizing that the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.
In conclusion, understanding the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 29042 is essential for improving asthma care. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview, enabling patients and providers to make informed decisions.
To visualize the healthcare landscape in 29042 and beyond, consider exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can help you pinpoint healthcare providers, assess access to care, and understand the geographic distribution of resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like