The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 29118, Orangeburg, South Carolina is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.93 percent of the residents in 29118 has some form of health insurance. 41.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29118 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,413 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29118. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,860 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 656 health care providers accessible to residents in 29118, Orangeburg, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29118, Orangeburg, South Carolina
Asthma Score | 23 |
---|---|
People Score | 24 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 36 |
Travel Score | 43 |
29118 | Orangeburg | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Orangeburg, SC (ZIP Code 29118)
Analyzing asthma care within Orangeburg, South Carolina (ZIP Code 29118) necessitates a multifaceted approach, considering not only the availability of physicians but also the quality of care, accessibility of resources, and integration of modern healthcare practices. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, evaluating the current landscape and identifying areas for improvement.
The foundation of effective asthma management lies in accessible primary care. Within ZIP Code 29118, primary care physician (PCP) availability serves as a critical determinant of the Asthma Score. Physician-to-patient ratios are a key metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer doctors per patient, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised care. Publicly available data, such as that from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) or the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), should be consulted to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio for the area. This data point directly influences the initial score. A favorable ratio, indicating adequate access, contributes positively to the score, while a concerning ratio detracts.
Beyond simple availability, the quality of primary care practices plays a crucial role. We must consider if practices offer comprehensive asthma management. This includes routine check-ups, asthma action plans, medication management, and patient education. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs and demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based asthma guidelines will receive a higher score. Patient reviews and testimonials, when available, can offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the perceived quality of care. These qualitative assessments, while subjective, can inform the overall evaluation.
Specific practices within the ZIP code warrant individual scrutiny. Identifying standout practices that excel in asthma care is essential. These practices might be characterized by a multidisciplinary approach, involving not only PCPs but also pulmonologists, allergists, and respiratory therapists. The presence of these specialists within a practice or readily available through referral networks enhances the Asthma Score. Furthermore, practices that actively engage in community outreach programs related to asthma awareness and prevention deserve recognition.
The adoption of telemedicine is a significant factor in the modern healthcare landscape. Telemedicine offers the potential to increase access to care, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of asthma symptoms, and online educational resources will receive a higher score. Telemedicine can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and facilitate timely interventions, ultimately leading to better asthma control. The availability of telehealth options directly impacts the accessibility component of the Asthma Score.
Asthma is often intertwined with mental health. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of the Asthma Score. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral networks with mental health professionals receive a higher score. Integrated care, where mental health professionals collaborate with PCPs and pulmonologists, is ideal. This holistic approach addresses the complex needs of asthma patients. The integration of mental health resources is a vital component for a well-rounded Asthma Score.
Medication accessibility is another important consideration. The Asthma Score should consider the ease with which patients can obtain necessary medications. Proximity to pharmacies, the availability of affordable medication options, and the practice's assistance with insurance and medication assistance programs all contribute to this aspect of the score. Practices that actively help patients navigate the complexities of medication access will receive a higher score.
Another important aspect is the practice's commitment to patient education. Practices that provide comprehensive asthma education, including proper inhaler technique training, symptom management strategies, and trigger avoidance techniques, receive a higher score. Patient education empowers individuals to manage their condition effectively and improve their quality of life. The availability of educational materials in multiple languages can further enhance accessibility.
Environmental factors also play a role in asthma management. The Asthma Score should consider the local environment. Practices that educate patients about environmental triggers, such as allergens and air quality, and provide resources for mitigating these triggers will receive a higher score. Collaboration with local health departments to address environmental concerns can further enhance the score.
In addition to the above factors, the Asthma Score should also consider the practice's use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs facilitate better communication between healthcare providers, improve care coordination, and allow for the tracking of patient outcomes. Practices that effectively utilize EHRs will receive a higher score.
The Asthma Score will be a composite of all the above factors. Each factor will be assigned a weight based on its importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the availability of specialists will likely have higher weights than the availability of educational materials. The final score will be a numerical value that reflects the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care within ZIP Code 29118. The higher the score, the better the asthma care.
Ultimately, the Asthma Score provides a snapshot of the current state of asthma care. It is not a static measure. Regular updates and reassessments are necessary to track progress and identify areas for ongoing improvement. The score can be used to inform public health initiatives, guide healthcare policy decisions, and empower patients to make informed choices about their healthcare.
To visualize the distribution of physicians, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data points within Orangeburg County, including ZIP Code 29118, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers a powerful mapping platform for analyzing geographic data and understanding the spatial relationships between healthcare resources and the population.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like