The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 29445, Goose Creek, South Carolina is 87 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 80.05 percent of the residents in 29445 has some form of health insurance. 30.69 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29445 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 14,819 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 305 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29445. An estimate of 33 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 7,740 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 24,301 health care providers accessible to residents in 29445, Goose Creek, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29445, Goose Creek, South Carolina
Asthma Score | 62 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 87 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 71 |
29445 | Goose Creek | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of asthma care within the 29445 ZIP code, specifically focusing on Goose Creek, South Carolina, requires a multi-faceted approach. We must consider not only the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) but also the quality of care provided, the resources available to manage asthma, and the innovative approaches being adopted by local practices. A comprehensive "Asthma Score" for this area would reflect these factors, providing a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. Determining the exact ratio within Goose Creek necessitates accessing data from sources like the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the American Medical Association (AMA). This information, however, is often aggregated at the county level (Berkeley County in this case), making it difficult to pinpoint the situation within the specific ZIP code. A lower ratio, indicating more patients per PCP, can strain resources and potentially impact the ability to provide timely and comprehensive asthma care. This, in turn, can influence the overall Asthma Score.
The availability of primary care is paramount. Asthma often requires ongoing management, including regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and patient education. A shortage of PCPs can force patients to seek care in emergency rooms or urgent care clinics, leading to fragmented care and potentially poorer outcomes. The presence of a robust network of PCPs, accessible and accepting new patients, would significantly enhance the Asthma Score.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the local healthcare ecosystem. This involves researching practices known for their specialization in asthma care, their patient satisfaction ratings, and their commitment to evidence-based practices. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and collaborate effectively with pulmonologists would be strong contenders. Gathering patient reviews through platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals can provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Practices demonstrating a proactive approach to asthma management, such as offering evening or weekend appointments, would further elevate their scores.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication refills, can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine and integrated it seamlessly into their workflow would receive a higher Asthma Score. This includes the availability of remote monitoring devices that can track patient symptoms and medication adherence.
Mental health resources play a crucial role in asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their care model, either through on-site therapists or through referrals to mental health professionals, would be favorably viewed. This integrated approach acknowledges the interconnectedness of physical and mental health, leading to more holistic and effective asthma care.
The presence of specialized asthma clinics or pulmonologists within the area is a major positive indicator. Pulmonologists, with their expertise in respiratory diseases, are essential for managing severe or complex asthma cases. The proximity and accessibility of these specialists significantly impact the Asthma Score. Practices that have strong referral relationships with pulmonologists would be better positioned to provide comprehensive care.
The Asthma Score also considers the availability of patient education materials and resources. Practices that provide patients with clear, concise information about asthma triggers, medication management, and self-management techniques would receive higher scores. This includes the availability of written materials, online resources, and educational programs. The ability to provide culturally sensitive materials, tailored to the specific needs of the patient population, would be a further advantage.
Finally, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) is a critical component of modern healthcare. Practices that utilize EHRs to track patient data, monitor medication adherence, and coordinate care with other providers would be better equipped to provide effective asthma management. The ability to share patient information electronically with specialists and pharmacies improves care coordination and reduces the risk of errors.
In conclusion, assessing the asthma care landscape in Goose Creek, ZIP code 29445, requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, the adoption of innovative approaches like telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the availability of patient education. The Asthma Score is not a static number; it reflects the dynamic nature of healthcare and the ongoing efforts of local practices to improve patient outcomes. The goal is to identify areas of strength and areas needing improvement, ultimately leading to better asthma management for the residents of Goose Creek.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Goose Creek, including the location of practices, the availability of resources, and other relevant data points, explore the power of CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like