29510, Andrews, South Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 29510, Andrews, South Carolina is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.77 percent of the residents in 29510 has some form of health insurance. 50.77 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.69 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29510 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,478 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29510. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,631 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 198 health care providers accessible to residents in 29510, Andrews, South Carolina.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Andrews, SC (ZIP Code 29510)**

Andrews, South Carolina, a community within ZIP Code 29510, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities when assessing asthma care availability and quality. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score," a composite evaluation of the resources and accessibility of care for individuals managing asthma within this specific geographic area. The score is not a numerical value, but rather a qualitative assessment based on several key factors, including physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health support, all crucial elements for comprehensive asthma management.

The foundation of effective asthma care rests on the availability of qualified medical professionals. In Andrews, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical consideration. While precise figures fluctuate, a generally accepted benchmark is the number of primary care physicians per 1,000 residents. A low ratio indicates a potential strain on the healthcare system, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to preventative care. In Andrews, the ratio likely reflects a rural setting, possibly indicating a lower number of physicians per capita compared to more urbanized areas. This scarcity emphasizes the importance of efficient resource allocation and innovative service delivery models.

Within the context of primary care availability in Andrews, the presence of primary care physicians is vital. A significant portion of asthma management often falls under the purview of primary care providers, who are responsible for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing monitoring. The number of primary care physicians, including family doctors and internal medicine specialists, directly impacts the ability of residents to receive timely and appropriate care. The availability of these physicians is a key determinant of the Asthma Score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the characteristics of the medical practices themselves significantly influence the quality of asthma care. Some practices may stand out due to their specialized expertise, advanced equipment, or patient-centered approach. For instance, practices that have a dedicated asthma educator or respiratory therapist on staff are more likely to provide comprehensive patient education and support, a critical component of asthma management. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) can facilitate better communication between providers and improve care coordination. The Asthma Score considers these aspects of practice quality.

Telemedicine is another essential element to consider. The adoption of telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online educational resources, can significantly improve asthma care, especially in rural areas where geographical barriers to care are common. Telemedicine can reduce travel time, increase access to specialists, and facilitate more frequent monitoring of patients' conditions. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies will likely receive a higher score in this area. The degree of telemedicine adoption directly impacts the Asthma Score.

Mental health resources are often an overlooked but crucial aspect of asthma management. Asthma can be a chronic condition that significantly impacts a person's quality of life. The psychological burden of asthma, including anxiety and depression, can worsen asthma symptoms and make it more difficult for patients to adhere to their treatment plans. Practices that integrate mental health services, either directly or through referrals, are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. The Asthma Score considers the availability and accessibility of mental health resources.

Specific examples of standout practices in Andrews, if available, would significantly influence the Asthma Score. Practices that have demonstrated a commitment to asthma care through specialized programs, patient education initiatives, or positive patient outcomes would be recognized. Such practices could include those that offer asthma action plans, regular follow-up appointments, and individualized treatment plans. The presence of these elements would enhance the overall score.

The Asthma Score is not just a measure of the resources available; it also reflects the accessibility of those resources. Factors such as insurance acceptance, appointment availability, and transportation options all play a role. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer flexible appointment scheduling are more accessible to a broader patient population. The availability of transportation assistance, such as free or subsidized rides to appointments, can also improve access to care. The accessibility of care is a critical factor in determining the Asthma Score.

Furthermore, the Asthma Score should reflect the overall health of the community. Factors such as air quality, socioeconomic status, and access to healthy food options can all impact asthma prevalence and severity. Communities with poor air quality or high rates of poverty may face greater challenges in managing asthma. The Asthma Score considers these broader environmental and social determinants of health.

In conclusion, the Asthma Score for Andrews, SC (ZIP Code 29510) is a complex evaluation that considers physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and community health factors. The availability of primary care physicians, the quality of medical practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources are all essential components of comprehensive asthma management. While the specific score cannot be quantified without detailed data, the analysis highlights the key areas that need attention to improve asthma care in Andrews.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Andrews, SC, and to visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping tools that can provide valuable insights into physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data points.