The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 29708, Fort Mill, South Carolina is 22 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.66 percent of the residents in 29708 has some form of health insurance. 19.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.23 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29708 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 11,258 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29708. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,285 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 7,347 health care providers accessible to residents in 29708, Fort Mill, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29708, Fort Mill, South Carolina
Asthma Score | 33 |
---|---|
People Score | 59 |
Provider Score | 22 |
Hospital Score | 18 |
Travel Score | 69 |
29708 | Fort Mill | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on evaluating asthma care within ZIP code 29708, specifically within the context of Fort Mill, South Carolina. The goal is to create an "Asthma Score" that assesses the quality and accessibility of care for asthma sufferers, considering factors like physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and mental health support. This assessment will highlight strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within the local healthcare landscape.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical component of the Asthma Score. A higher ratio of patients per primary care physician (PCP) in Fort Mill can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised asthma management. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. To evaluate this, publicly available data from sources like the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the U.S. Census Bureau, along with information from healthcare directories, would be analyzed. This data would be combined with estimates of the asthma prevalence rate in 29708 to determine the practical impact of the physician-to-patient ratio on asthma patients.
Standout practices within Fort Mill would be identified based on several criteria. First, practices with a dedicated focus on respiratory health, including board-certified pulmonologists or allergists, would receive high marks. Second, practices that adhere to the latest asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), would be considered exemplary. This includes practices that regularly assess asthma control, provide personalized asthma action plans, and offer patient education on proper inhaler technique and environmental control measures. Third, patient reviews and testimonials, readily available through online platforms like Healthgrades and Zocdoc, would be scrutinized to gauge patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care.
The adoption of telemedicine is a significant factor in the Asthma Score. Telemedicine, including video consultations and remote monitoring, can significantly improve asthma management by increasing patient access to care, especially for those with mobility issues or who live in remote areas. Practices that offer telemedicine options for routine follow-up appointments, medication refills, and asthma education would be ranked favorably. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician, would further enhance the score. The ease of use of the telemedicine platform, including technical support for patients, would also be evaluated.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are crucial. Asthma can exacerbate anxiety and depression, and these mental health conditions can, in turn, worsen asthma symptoms. The Asthma Score would assess the availability of mental health services within primary care practices or through referrals to specialists. Practices that have integrated mental health screenings into their asthma care protocols, or that offer on-site counseling or therapy, would receive a higher score. The ease of access to these services, including the availability of appointments and the acceptance of insurance, would be considered.
The Asthma Score would be calculated using a weighted system, with each factor assigned a specific percentage of the total score. Physician-to-patient ratio, for instance, might account for 25% of the score, while practice characteristics and adherence to guidelines could account for 30%. Telemedicine adoption and mental health resources would each contribute 20% and 5%, respectively. The final score would be presented on a scale, perhaps from 1 to 10, with 10 representing the highest quality of asthma care.
Analyzing the data, it is imperative to consider the specific demographics of 29708. Fort Mill is a rapidly growing area with a diverse population. This demographic information would be considered to assess the accessibility of care for different patient populations, including children, the elderly, and those from underserved communities. The score would be adjusted to account for the availability of bilingual services and culturally sensitive care.
The analysis would also consider the geographical distribution of healthcare providers within 29708. Are primary care physicians and specialists evenly distributed throughout the ZIP code, or are there areas with limited access to care? This spatial analysis would help identify potential healthcare deserts and inform strategies to improve access to asthma care.
Furthermore, the Asthma Score would be a dynamic tool. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and the score would be updated regularly to reflect changes in physician availability, practice characteristics, and the adoption of new technologies. This ongoing assessment would ensure that the score remains a relevant and accurate reflection of the quality of asthma care in Fort Mill.
The creation of this Asthma Score is a complex process that requires the collection and analysis of a wide range of data. However, the result will be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It will provide a clear and concise assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Fort Mill, highlighting areas of strength and areas that need improvement. This information can be used to inform healthcare decisions, improve patient outcomes, and ultimately, enhance the lives of asthma sufferers in the community.
To visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare providers, patient demographics, and other relevant data, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a powerful platform for visualizing complex datasets, enabling you to identify patterns and trends that might not be apparent through other means. Explore how CartoChrome can help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Fort Mill.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like