The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 29921, Furman, South Carolina is 26 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.30 percent of the residents in 29921 has some form of health insurance. 65.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 35.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29921 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 86 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29921. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 71 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 305 health care providers accessible to residents in 29921, Furman, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29921, Furman, South Carolina
Asthma Score | 38 |
---|---|
People Score | 55 |
Provider Score | 26 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 41 |
29921 | Furman | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of asthma care within ZIP code 29921, encompassing the Furman area, requires a multifaceted approach. Evaluating the quality and accessibility of care necessitates an examination of physician availability, the adoption of innovative technologies, and the integration of mental health services, all within the context of asthma management. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive "Asthma Score" assessment, focusing on key indicators that influence patient outcomes and overall healthcare quality.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental element of this assessment. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists directly impacts the ease with which patients can access necessary care. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a higher concentration of physicians relative to the population, generally translates to better access, shorter wait times, and more opportunities for proactive management. Conversely, a high ratio can lead to delayed diagnoses, inadequate follow-up care, and increased reliance on emergency room visits, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. The specific ratio within 29921 and the surrounding areas is crucial for determining the overall score.
Primary care availability in Furman, a significant component of the analysis, needs a deeper look. Are there enough PCPs to meet the needs of the population? How readily accessible are these physicians? Do they accept a wide range of insurance plans, including those commonly used by individuals with asthma? The physical location of practices, their hours of operation, and the availability of after-hours care are also important considerations. Furman's geographical layout and transportation options will influence how easily patients can reach these practices. A well-developed primary care network, characterized by sufficient physician density, convenient locations, and comprehensive services, will contribute positively to the Asthma Score.
Identifying standout practices within the 29921 ZIP code is vital. These practices often serve as models for best practices in asthma management. Their success can be attributed to several factors, including: a focus on patient education, the implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols, and the integration of specialized services. Examining the specific approaches employed by these practices, such as the use of asthma action plans, regular monitoring of lung function, and the provision of patient support groups, can provide valuable insights. These practices often demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement, adopting the latest advancements in asthma care.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element of the Asthma Score. Telemedicine offers a powerful tool for improving access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients' conditions remotely, and provide educational resources online can significantly enhance asthma management. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, such as video conferencing for follow-up appointments and remote monitoring devices, often demonstrate a higher level of patient engagement and improved outcomes. The extent of telemedicine adoption within 29921, including the availability of telehealth options for asthma patients, will influence the overall score.
The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as an essential component of comprehensive asthma care. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that offer or provide referrals to mental health services, such as counseling or support groups, demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. The availability of mental health resources within 29921, and the extent to which primary care practices integrate these resources into their asthma management plans, will contribute significantly to the Asthma Score.
To calculate the Asthma Score, a weighted system will be used. Physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration will each be assigned a specific weight based on their relative importance. The score will then be calculated by evaluating each factor and assigning a numerical value based on its performance. For example, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio and a robust telemedicine program would receive a higher score in those categories. The final Asthma Score will provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care within 29921.
The analysis will also consider factors such as the prevalence of asthma within the population, the socioeconomic characteristics of the area, and the availability of specialized services, such as pulmonary rehabilitation programs. These factors will be used to contextualize the Asthma Score and provide a more nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in asthma care within the region. The analysis will also identify areas for improvement and provide recommendations for enhancing the quality and accessibility of care.
The final Asthma Score will be presented in a clear and concise format, with a detailed breakdown of the individual factors that contribute to the overall score. This will allow healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current state of asthma care within 29921. The analysis will also highlight best practices and provide recommendations for improving patient outcomes.
The overall goal of this analysis is to provide a valuable resource for improving asthma care within the Furman area. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, the analysis can help healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers make informed decisions about how to improve the quality and accessibility of care. The data gathered can be used to create targeted interventions, such as increasing physician recruitment, expanding telemedicine services, and improving mental health integration.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, access patient demographics, and pinpoint areas with the greatest needs, consider leveraging the power of data visualization. Explore CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape within 29921 and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like