The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 24822, Clear Fork, West Virginia is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.15 percent of the residents in 24822 has some form of health insurance. 38.65 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.22 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 24822 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 132 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 24822. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 180 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 245 health care providers accessible to residents in 24822, Clear Fork, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 24822, Clear Fork, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 15 |
---|---|
People Score | 58 |
Provider Score | 15 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 21 |
24822 | Clear Fork | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP Code 24822, specifically focusing on Clear Fork, requires a multifaceted approach. We'll examine the quality of care, accessibility, and the resources available to manage this chronic respiratory condition. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial factors in providing comprehensive asthma care.
The foundation of effective asthma management lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Clear Fork, the PCP-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors for a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment adjustments. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access, allowing for more frequent check-ups and proactive care. Publicly available data, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) data, provides estimates, but a precise calculation demands local data gathering. This is particularly important because asthma often requires ongoing monitoring and adjustments to medication.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care provided by PCPs is paramount. Are they well-versed in current asthma guidelines, such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP)? Do they have the necessary equipment, such as peak flow meters and spirometers, for accurate diagnosis and monitoring? Do they provide patient education on asthma triggers, medication use, and emergency management? These are all key elements of a good asthma score.
Identifying standout practices within 24822 is crucial. These practices often demonstrate exemplary asthma management through various means. They might have dedicated asthma educators, offering individualized training on inhaler techniques and trigger avoidance. They might participate in quality improvement initiatives, tracking patient outcomes and implementing evidence-based interventions. They may also have strong partnerships with pulmonologists and allergists, ensuring timely referrals for patients with complex cases. Researching online reviews, interviewing patients, and consulting with local healthcare organizations can help identify these high-performing practices.
Telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare accessibility, and its adoption in asthma care is significant. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of lung function. This is particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas like Clear Fork, where geographical barriers can hinder access to in-person appointments. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience, reduce travel time, and facilitate more frequent communication, leading to better asthma control. The extent of telemedicine adoption, including the types of services offered and the technology used, is a crucial component of the asthma score.
Asthma is not merely a physical condition; its impact extends to mental health. Anxiety and depression are common among asthma patients, often exacerbated by the fear of asthma attacks and the limitations the condition imposes. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is essential. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who can provide support and treatment for these co-occurring conditions. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care model demonstrate a holistic approach, improving overall patient well-being. This integration is a significant factor in determining the asthma score.
Assessing the availability of asthma medications is also critical. Are essential medications, such as rescue inhalers and controller medications, readily accessible through local pharmacies? Are there programs to assist patients with the cost of these medications, especially for those with limited financial resources? The ability to obtain and afford necessary medications directly impacts asthma control and the overall quality of life for patients. This is a key consideration when assessing the overall asthma score.
Furthermore, community resources play a significant role in asthma management. Are there support groups for asthma patients and their families? Are there educational programs offered by local health organizations or hospitals? These resources provide patients with valuable information, peer support, and coping strategies, contributing to better asthma management. This community involvement is a positive factor in the asthma score.
The asthma score for doctors in 24822, particularly those serving Clear Fork, is a complex calculation. It's not a simple ranking but a composite measure reflecting the interplay of various factors. The ideal score would be based on a detailed analysis of the factors discussed above, weighted according to their relative importance. The score would then be used to identify areas for improvement and to highlight best practices.
The analysis requires gathering data from multiple sources, including physician directories, insurance providers, patient surveys, and local health organizations. This data should be analyzed to assess the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by PCPs, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the access to asthma medications and community support.
Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to improve asthma care in Clear Fork. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, we can identify opportunities to enhance access to care, improve the quality of care, and ultimately improve the lives of asthma patients.
If you're interested in visualizing this data and identifying patterns in asthma care within 24822, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides powerful mapping and data visualization tools that can help you understand the spatial distribution of resources and identify areas with unmet needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like