The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25021, Bim, West Virginia is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.53 percent of the residents in 25021 has some form of health insurance. 64.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 47.25 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25021 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 29 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25021. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 124 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 76 health care providers accessible to residents in 25021, Bim, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25021, Bim, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 15 |
---|---|
People Score | 36 |
Provider Score | 37 |
Hospital Score | 44 |
Travel Score | 18 |
25021 | Bim | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25021 and Primary Care Availability in Bim
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning asthma management, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on two key elements: the availability and performance of physicians in ZIP code 25021, and the broader primary care landscape in Bim, a region where 25021 is likely located. We will assess factors influencing asthma care, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment, specifically its ability to serve asthma patients.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental metric. In ZIP code 25021, a low ratio (a high number of patients per doctor) would indicate potential access challenges. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests potentially better access. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) must be used to determine the exact ratio. This data should be compared to state and national averages. A significantly lower ratio than the state or national average would raise concerns about access barriers, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment, and increased asthma exacerbations. Conversely, a higher ratio would indicate better access, potentially leading to better asthma control.
Identifying standout practices within 25021 is crucial. This requires evaluating several factors. First, the practice's asthma-specific expertise. Does the practice have physicians board-certified in allergy and immunology or pulmonology? Second, the practice's adherence to national asthma guidelines. Are they implementing the latest guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP)? Third, patient outcomes. What are the practice's hospitalization rates for asthma? What is the rate of asthma-related emergency room visits? Fourth, patient satisfaction. Do patients report high levels of satisfaction with their care? Reviewing patient reviews on platforms like Healthgrades and Vitals can provide valuable insights. Practices demonstrating excellence in these areas should be highlighted as models for other providers.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. The availability of telehealth services in 25021 significantly impacts asthma management. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients who live far from medical facilities. It can facilitate medication management, provide patient education, and monitor asthma symptoms remotely. The extent to which practices in 25021 offer telehealth services, including video consultations and remote monitoring, should be assessed. Practices that have embraced telehealth, particularly those using it to improve asthma control, should be recognized for their innovation.
The integration of mental health resources is a critical, often overlooked, aspect of asthma care. Asthma, a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress can worsen asthma symptoms and reduce treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health support within the primary care setting or through referrals is essential. Are primary care practices in 25021 equipped to screen for mental health issues? Do they have partnerships with mental health providers? Are they providing resources for stress management and coping strategies? Practices that prioritize mental health integration are better positioned to provide holistic asthma care.
Primary care availability in Bim, the broader region, influences the healthcare landscape in 25021. A robust primary care infrastructure in Bim can improve access to asthma specialists and other healthcare services. The geographic distribution of primary care physicians, the availability of urgent care clinics, and the presence of hospitals all impact the overall healthcare ecosystem. Areas with limited primary care access can lead to increased reliance on emergency rooms for asthma care, which is often less effective and more expensive. A comprehensive assessment of primary care availability in Bim is essential to understand the context of asthma care in 25021.
Data collection and analysis are crucial to producing an accurate asthma score. This requires gathering information from various sources, including physician directories, healthcare databases, patient surveys, and public health reports. The data should be analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and areas for improvement. The analysis should consider the specific needs of the population in 25021, including demographic factors, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of asthma.
The final asthma score should be a comprehensive assessment that reflects the quality and accessibility of asthma care in 25021. It should consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the characteristics of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the broader primary care landscape in Bim. The score should be used to identify strengths and weaknesses and to guide efforts to improve asthma care in the region.
A high asthma score would indicate a healthcare environment that supports effective asthma management. This would include a sufficient number of physicians, practices that adhere to national guidelines, the availability of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and a robust primary care infrastructure. A low score would indicate areas for improvement.
The analysis should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. As new data becomes available and healthcare practices evolve, the asthma score should be revised to ensure its accuracy and relevance. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that asthma patients in 25021 and Bim receive the best possible care.
To visualize and further analyze the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and asthma prevalence, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful visual representation of the healthcare environment, allowing for a more in-depth understanding of the challenges and opportunities for improving asthma care in ZIP code 25021 and the surrounding Bim region.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like