The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25088, Glen, West Virginia is 24 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.90 percent of the residents in 25088 has some form of health insurance. 57.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 43.31 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25088 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25088. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 9 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 159 health care providers accessible to residents in 25088, Glen, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25088, Glen, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 10 |
---|---|
People Score | 41 |
Provider Score | 24 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 13 |
25088 | Glen | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP code 25088, encompassing the Glen area, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, evaluate the adoption of telemedicine, and examine the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of asthma management. The goal is to provide a comprehensive asthma score analysis for residents.
The foundation of effective asthma care lies in accessible primary care. In Glen, the availability of primary care physicians directly impacts the ability of patients to receive timely diagnoses, ongoing management, and acute care when needed. A scarcity of primary care physicians can lead to delayed treatment, exacerbations, and increased hospitalizations for asthma patients. Conversely, a robust primary care infrastructure allows for proactive asthma management, including regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and patient education.
Physician-to-patient ratios are critical indicators of healthcare access. A high ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can strain resources, leading to longer wait times for appointments and potentially compromising the quality of care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility and the potential for more personalized attention. Data on physician-to-patient ratios within 25088, specifically for primary care physicians, is essential to understanding the overall capacity to serve the asthma patient population. Public health data, combined with local hospital and clinic information, provides a clearer picture of the healthcare landscape.
Identifying standout practices is crucial. These practices often demonstrate excellence in asthma management through various means. This includes adherence to national guidelines, patient education programs, proactive outreach to patients, and robust communication systems. Evaluating the practices involves assessing their patient outcomes, such as rates of asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. Furthermore, practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care are particularly noteworthy, recognizing the significant link between asthma and mental well-being.
Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare, offering numerous benefits for asthma patients. It allows for remote consultations, medication management, and patient monitoring. In the context of Glen, the adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices can improve access to care, especially for patients in remote areas or those with mobility limitations. Assessing the level of telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and digital patient portals.
Mental health resources are a vital component of comprehensive asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other psychological challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma management programs are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This includes providing access to mental health professionals, offering support groups, and educating patients about the connection between asthma and mental health. The availability of these resources within 25088 is a key factor in the overall asthma score.
Evaluating the asthma score requires a systematic approach. This involves gathering data on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by local practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The collected data can be weighted based on their relative importance, and the overall score is determined. The score will be a composite measure reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in the area.
The analysis of asthma care in Glen, specifically within ZIP code 25088, reveals a complex interplay of factors. Primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources all contribute to the overall asthma score. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for improving asthma care and ensuring that residents receive the support they need to manage their condition effectively.
The assessment of specific practices involves evaluating their adherence to asthma management guidelines, their patient education programs, and their communication systems. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to these areas are more likely to achieve positive patient outcomes. Further, practices that proactively reach out to patients, such as those with chronic conditions, are often better able to manage and control symptoms.
Telemedicine's impact is significant. It can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access care remotely. This is particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas or those with limited mobility. The adoption of telemedicine tools, such as virtual appointments and remote monitoring devices, enhances patient access and improves the efficiency of care delivery.
The integration of mental health services is crucial. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, and providing access to mental health professionals is essential for comprehensive care. Practices that recognize this connection and integrate mental health services into their asthma management programs are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients.
The overall asthma score for 25088 is a composite measure reflecting the quality and accessibility of asthma care. It is determined by weighting the various factors discussed above. The score is an indicator of the overall health of the asthma care system in the area. Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to identify areas for improvement and ensure that residents receive the best possible care.
Understanding the geography of healthcare access is crucial for effective asthma management. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of healthcare resources, including the location of primary care physicians, specialist clinics, and pharmacies. These maps can also highlight areas with limited access to care, allowing for targeted interventions and resource allocation. They can also overlay data on asthma prevalence and socioeconomic factors to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by asthma patients in Glen.
For a more in-depth understanding of the healthcare landscape in 25088, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These maps offer a visual and interactive way to analyze healthcare data, identify areas of need, and make informed decisions about healthcare planning and resource allocation.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like