25093, Gordon, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25093, Gordon, West Virginia is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25093 has some form of health insurance. 100.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 19.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25093 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 30 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25093. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 42 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 275 health care providers accessible to residents in 25093, Gordon, West Virginia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Gordon, WV (ZIP Code 25093)

Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality in Gordon, West Virginia (ZIP code 25093), requires a nuanced understanding of the local landscape, particularly concerning asthma management. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess the physician-to-patient ratio, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all factors crucial for individuals managing asthma. This will culminate in a comprehensive “Asthma Score” assessment for the area.

Gordon, a small community, likely faces challenges common to rural areas, including physician shortages and limited access to specialized care. The initial step is determining the actual number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the 25093 ZIP code. This number, however, doesn't tell the whole story. A more accurate assessment considers the physician-to-patient ratio. National averages can provide a baseline, but the specific ratio in Gordon needs to be determined to understand the potential burden on each physician. A high ratio suggests longer wait times for appointments and potentially less time for each patient, which can negatively impact asthma management.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. These are medical facilities demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive asthma care. This could involve clinics that actively participate in asthma education programs, offer robust patient support services, and adhere to the latest treatment guidelines. These practices often have dedicated asthma educators, provide personalized asthma action plans, and proactively monitor patient outcomes. The presence of such practices significantly boosts the “Asthma Score” for the area.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can be a game-changer in rural areas. It can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with specialists, receive medication refills, and monitor their asthma symptoms without traveling long distances. Practices that embrace telemedicine, particularly those offering virtual asthma consultations and remote monitoring tools, will contribute positively to the “Asthma Score.” The ease of access to virtual consultations is a critical consideration.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of chronic illnesses like asthma, but their importance cannot be overstated. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, within the community or accessible through telehealth, is a vital component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma management programs will receive a higher score. The availability of mental health support is a key indicator of patient well-being.

The “Asthma Score” itself is a composite metric, a numerical representation of the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in Gordon. It’s calculated by assigning weighted scores to each of the factors discussed above: physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability. A higher score indicates better access to care and a more supportive environment for asthma patients. The specific methodology for calculating the score would involve gathering data from various sources, including physician directories, healthcare provider websites, and patient surveys.

For the physician-to-patient ratio, a lower ratio (more physicians per patient) would receive a higher score. The presence of practices actively engaged in asthma education and patient support would also increase the score. Practices that offer telemedicine services would receive a higher score than those that do not. The availability of mental health resources would also positively impact the score.

In the absence of specific, localized data, it is difficult to provide a definitive “Asthma Score” for Gordon. However, a hypothetical assessment can be constructed. Assuming a limited number of PCPs and a high physician-to-patient ratio, the initial score would be relatively low. If there are no dedicated asthma clinics or educational programs, the score would remain low. However, if even a single practice embraces telemedicine and integrates mental health services, the score would increase. This illustrates the potential impact of individual practices on the overall healthcare landscape.

Data collection is the most critical step in accurately determining the “Asthma Score.” This involves identifying all PCPs practicing within the ZIP code, assessing their patient load, and evaluating the services they offer. This information can be obtained through a combination of online research, direct contact with healthcare providers, and potentially through partnerships with local health organizations.

The analysis would then need to consider the availability of specialists, such as pulmonologists and allergists, who are essential for managing severe asthma cases. The proximity of these specialists and the ease of referral are crucial factors. Furthermore, the availability of pharmacies and the accessibility of asthma medications, including inhalers and nebulizers, are also important considerations.

The final “Asthma Score” would provide a valuable snapshot of the healthcare environment for asthma patients in Gordon. It would highlight areas of strength and identify areas where improvements are needed. This information can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations to develop strategies to improve asthma care.

For example, if the score is low, it might indicate a need for initiatives to attract more physicians to the area, promote telemedicine adoption, or increase the availability of asthma education programs. The score would also inform individuals seeking healthcare in the area.

To visualize and better understand the healthcare landscape in Gordon and surrounding areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a spatial representation of physician locations, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data points, making it easier to identify areas with limited access to care and to assess the overall “Asthma Score” within a broader geographic context. Explore CartoChrome maps today to gain a more comprehensive understanding of healthcare accessibility in your community.