25132, Mammoth, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25132, Mammoth, West Virginia is 88 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 77.05 percent of the residents in 25132 has some form of health insurance. 36.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.50 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25132 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 125 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25132. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 53 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 241 health care providers accessible to residents in 25132, Mammoth, West Virginia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Mammoth, WV (ZIP Code 25132)

Analyzing healthcare access and quality within ZIP Code 25132, encompassing Mammoth, West Virginia, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on asthma care, primary care availability, and related resources, culminating in an "Asthma Score" assessment. This score, though not a formal metric, provides a comparative understanding of the area's strengths and weaknesses in meeting the needs of asthma patients.

The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible and competent primary care. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts the ability of residents to receive timely diagnoses, develop personalized asthma action plans, and manage their condition effectively. Unfortunately, rural areas like Mammoth often face challenges in PCP access. Physician-to-patient ratios are crucial. While precise figures fluctuate, the national average is a useful benchmark. If Mammoth's ratio significantly exceeds this average, it signals potential difficulties in securing timely appointments and establishing consistent patient-physician relationships, which are vital for asthma management.

Identifying standout practices is essential. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma care might exhibit specific characteristics. These could include a dedicated asthma educator on staff, offering patient education materials, and actively participating in asthma-related community outreach programs. Furthermore, practices utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient outcomes and medication adherence often demonstrate a higher standard of care. Such practices would likely score higher in an asthma-focused evaluation.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers a potential solution to geographical barriers, enabling patients to consult with physicians remotely. This is particularly beneficial for routine follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and providing support during asthma exacerbations. The presence of telemedicine capabilities within local practices would positively impact the Asthma Score. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, or access to online educational resources would demonstrate a proactive approach to asthma management.

Beyond the direct medical aspects, the availability of mental health resources significantly impacts asthma management. Asthma, a chronic condition, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The presence of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, within the community or readily accessible through referrals, is vital. Practices that actively screen for mental health concerns and offer integrated care or referral pathways would receive a higher score. The integration of mental health support acknowledges the holistic needs of asthma patients.

The Asthma Score, in this context, is a composite assessment. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialized asthma care within practices, the adoption of telemedicine technologies, and the availability of mental health resources. A higher score indicates a more favorable environment for asthma patients, characterized by greater access to care, proactive management strategies, and comprehensive support systems.

Let's consider some hypothetical scenarios within ZIP Code 25132. A practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, a dedicated asthma educator, robust telemedicine capabilities, and established mental health referral pathways would likely achieve a high Asthma Score. Conversely, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine options, and a lack of mental health resources would likely receive a lower score.

The analysis necessitates specific data. Information on the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP Code, the services offered by each practice, and the availability of mental health services are crucial. Public health data, such as asthma prevalence rates in the area, would provide further context. This data-driven approach allows for a more accurate and insightful assessment.

The impact of these factors extends beyond individual patient outcomes. A well-supported asthma population contributes to a healthier community. Reduced asthma exacerbations lead to fewer emergency room visits, lower healthcare costs, and improved overall quality of life. A proactive approach to asthma management strengthens the entire healthcare ecosystem.

The challenge lies in translating this analysis into actionable insights. Identifying areas for improvement is the first step. This might involve advocating for increased primary care access, promoting telemedicine adoption, or expanding mental health services. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government is essential to create a more supportive environment for asthma patients.

The dynamic nature of healthcare requires continuous monitoring and evaluation. Regular updates to the Asthma Score, based on evolving data and healthcare landscape changes, would be beneficial. This ongoing assessment ensures that strategies remain relevant and effective. The goal is to create a healthcare system that effectively meets the needs of asthma patients in Mammoth and the surrounding areas.

The analysis, however, is limited without the visual context of geographic data. Understanding the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, patient populations, and environmental factors is crucial for a complete picture. This is where the power of mapping technology becomes apparent.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Mammoth, West Virginia (ZIP Code 25132), and gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing asthma care, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a powerful platform for analyzing geographic data, identifying patterns, and making informed decisions. Explore the potential of CartoChrome maps to visualize the data discussed in this analysis and gain a comprehensive understanding of asthma care in Mammoth.