The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25160, Pond Gap, West Virginia is 94 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 99.77 percent of the residents in 25160 has some form of health insurance. 69.11 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.67 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25160 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 35 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25160. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 177 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 227 health care providers accessible to residents in 25160, Pond Gap, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25160, Pond Gap, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 91 |
---|---|
People Score | 93 |
Provider Score | 94 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 36 |
25160 | Pond Gap | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses the asthma care landscape for residents of ZIP Code 25160, focusing on primary care accessibility and the availability of resources that impact asthma management. This evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support, all critical components of comprehensive asthma care. The geographical focus is on the Pond Gap area within the specified ZIP code.
Understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is a foundational step in evaluating healthcare accessibility. ZIP Code 25160, encompassing Pond Gap, likely faces challenges common to rural areas, including a potentially lower density of primary care physicians compared to urban centers. This can translate into longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialized care, and increased travel distances for residents needing medical attention. Accurate data on physician density requires access to comprehensive databases, which are often proprietary. However, publicly available resources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can offer insights into Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), indicating areas with insufficient medical personnel. If ZIP Code 25160 is designated as an HPSA, it underscores the need for strategies to improve physician recruitment and retention.
The identification of standout practices within Pond Gap is crucial. These practices, ideally, would demonstrate excellence in asthma management. This involves looking for clinics that adhere to established asthma guidelines, such as those provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Key indicators of quality care include regular asthma action plan development, patient education on triggers and medication use, and the availability of spirometry testing to assess lung function. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and track patient outcomes are likely to provide superior care. Identifying these high-performing practices necessitates a review of online reviews, patient testimonials, and potentially, direct outreach to healthcare providers in the area.
The adoption of telemedicine has the potential to significantly improve asthma care accessibility, particularly in rural settings like Pond Gap. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving medication adherence through virtual follow-up appointments. Practices that offer telemedicine services, especially for medication refills, asthma education, and routine check-ups, are better positioned to serve a wider patient population. The success of telemedicine, however, depends on factors such as patient access to reliable internet connectivity, the availability of user-friendly telehealth platforms, and the willingness of both patients and providers to embrace this technology.
Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact mental health. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and these mental health challenges can worsen asthma symptoms and reduce treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within Pond Gap is an important consideration. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and therapists, who are trained to address the psychological impact of chronic illness. Ideally, primary care practices should have established referral pathways to mental health services, and some practices might even integrate mental health screening and support directly into their asthma care programs. The presence of support groups and educational programs focused on managing the psychological aspects of asthma is also beneficial.
The evaluation of asthma care in Pond Gap requires a holistic approach, considering not only the availability of medical resources but also the broader social determinants of health. These factors include socioeconomic status, access to healthy food, housing quality, and environmental conditions. For instance, areas with high levels of air pollution or poor housing conditions (e.g., mold and dust mites) can exacerbate asthma symptoms. Addressing these broader factors is essential for improving asthma control and overall health outcomes. This often involves collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government agencies.
Analyzing the specific practices in the Pond Gap area, it is important to evaluate their specific approaches to asthma care. Does the practice utilize a standardized asthma action plan? Are patients educated on the proper use of inhalers and other medications? Are there regular reviews of patient medications to ensure they are appropriate and effective? Does the practice offer any patient education materials or programs focused on asthma management? The answers to these questions provide insights into the quality and comprehensiveness of the asthma care provided.
Furthermore, the integration of technology beyond telemedicine, such as remote monitoring devices or mobile health apps, can enhance asthma management. These tools allow patients to track their symptoms, medication use, and environmental triggers, providing valuable data for both patients and physicians. Practices that embrace these technologies are often at the forefront of innovative asthma care.
The success of asthma management also hinges on patient engagement and self-management skills. Practices that actively involve patients in their care, providing them with the knowledge and tools they need to manage their condition effectively, are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. This includes providing education on asthma triggers, proper inhaler technique, and the importance of medication adherence.
In conclusion, evaluating the asthma care landscape in Pond Gap (ZIP Code 25160) requires a multifaceted approach. Assessing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources are all essential components of this evaluation. Furthermore, considering the broader social determinants of health and the specific practices’ approach to asthma management is crucial for a comprehensive understanding.
To visualize the healthcare landscape in Pond Gap and gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing asthma care, consider exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of physician distribution, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data points, offering valuable insights for patients, providers, and policymakers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like