Asthma Score

25285, Wallback, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 25285, Wallback, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25285, Wallback, West Virginia is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.83 percent of the residents in 25285 has some form of health insurance. 69.75 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.52 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25285 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 188 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25285. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 97 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 22 health care providers accessible to residents in 25285, Wallback, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 25285, Wallback, West Virginia

Asthma Score 43
People Score 78
Provider Score 35
Hospital Score 42
Travel Score 28

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

25285 Wallback West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 25285, Wallback, West Virginia

## Asthma Score Analysis: Wallback, West Virginia (ZIP Code 25285)

Wallback, West Virginia, nestled within ZIP code 25285, presents a unique healthcare landscape. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services, with a specific focus on asthma management, assessing the "Asthma Score" for doctors in the area. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, investigate telemedicine adoption, and explore the presence of mental health resources, ultimately painting a picture of healthcare access in this rural community.

The foundation of any asthma score analysis lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. In a rural setting like Wallback, this ratio is likely a crucial factor. Sparse populations can sometimes translate to lower ratios, offering greater access to care. However, the reality often involves a scarcity of physicians, particularly primary care providers, leading to a higher patient load per doctor. This can directly impact the quality of asthma management, as it affects the time available for comprehensive patient evaluations, education, and follow-up appointments.

The availability of primary care physicians is intrinsically linked to asthma care. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, requires consistent monitoring and management. The primary care physician acts as the cornerstone of this management, providing initial diagnoses, prescribing medications, and coordinating care with specialists when necessary. A shortage of primary care providers can result in delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment plans, and increased hospitalizations for asthma exacerbations. The "Asthma Score" would therefore reflect the density of primary care physicians and their ability to provide timely and effective asthma care.

Identifying "standout practices" is essential for a comprehensive assessment. These practices often demonstrate exemplary asthma management protocols, including patient education programs, asthma action plans, and regular monitoring of lung function. Practices that actively engage in patient education, teaching proper inhaler techniques and identifying asthma triggers, would receive a higher score. Furthermore, practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, manage medication refills efficiently, and facilitate communication with patients would also be viewed favorably. The "Asthma Score" would weigh these factors, recognizing practices that go above and beyond standard care.

Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges in a rural setting. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care. For asthma patients, telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of lung function. However, the success of telemedicine hinges on several factors, including reliable internet access, patient comfort with technology, and the availability of trained staff to support virtual visits. Practices actively embracing telemedicine, especially those offering virtual asthma education sessions or remote monitoring programs, would likely receive a higher score, demonstrating a commitment to expanding access to care.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked, yet critical, component of asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. The presence of mental health resources, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, is crucial for addressing these co-occurring conditions. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care plans, either through in-house providers or referral networks, would receive a higher score. This holistic approach recognizes the interconnectedness of physical and mental health, leading to improved patient outcomes.

The "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP code 25285 would be a composite measure, incorporating the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. A low score would indicate limited access to care, potential delays in diagnosis and treatment, and a lack of comprehensive asthma management. A high score, conversely, would reflect a healthcare environment that prioritizes timely access to care, utilizes innovative technologies, and addresses the holistic needs of asthma patients.

Specific details about individual practices within Wallback are difficult to ascertain without access to proprietary healthcare data. However, we can infer certain aspects based on general trends in rural healthcare. For instance, a practice offering extended hours or weekend appointments would likely receive a higher score, as it increases access to care for working individuals. Similarly, a practice that actively participates in community outreach programs, such as asthma awareness campaigns or free screenings, would demonstrate a commitment to improving public health.

The challenges in rural healthcare are significant. Limited resources, geographical isolation, and socioeconomic factors can all impede access to care. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach, including investments in healthcare infrastructure, recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals, and the expansion of telemedicine services. The "Asthma Score" serves as a valuable tool for identifying areas for improvement and guiding efforts to enhance asthma care in Wallback and similar communities.

The success of asthma management also relies on patient education and self-management skills. Practices that provide comprehensive patient education, including training on inhaler techniques, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans, would be highly regarded. Furthermore, practices that empower patients to actively participate in their care, through self-monitoring and regular follow-up appointments, would demonstrate a commitment to improving patient outcomes.

In conclusion, assessing the "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP code 25285 involves a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare landscape. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources are all critical factors. While specific data on individual practices is needed for a definitive score, this analysis provides a framework for evaluating the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Wallback.

To gain a more visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Wallback and other rural communities, including physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and potential areas of need, explore the interactive maps available at CartoChrome. These maps can provide valuable insights into healthcare access and resource distribution.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 25285, Wallback, West Virginia

You may also like

25266, Newton, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 4.79 Miles

Total Population:

25259, Looneyville, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 7.63 Miles

Total Population:

25251, Left Hand, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 8.81 Miles

Total Population:

25235, Chloe, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 9.37 Miles

Total Population:

25268, Orma, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 13.50 Miles

Total Population:

25286, Walton, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 16.34 Miles

Total Population:

25261, Millstone, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 19.69 Miles

Total Population:

25243, Gandeeville, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 20.61 Miles

Total Population:

25276, Spencer, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25285: 21.88 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 25285, Wallback, West Virginia