The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25414, Charles Town, West Virginia is 66 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.23 percent of the residents in 25414 has some form of health insurance. 32.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25414 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,511 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 26 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25414. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,014 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,301 health care providers accessible to residents in 25414, Charles Town, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25414, Charles Town, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 61 |
---|---|
People Score | 65 |
Provider Score | 66 |
Hospital Score | 22 |
Travel Score | 55 |
25414 | Charles Town | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care and primary care accessibility in Charles Town, West Virginia (ZIP code 25414) necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This assessment, framed as an "Asthma Score" analysis, considers various factors influencing patient outcomes, including physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of mental health support. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview for residents and healthcare providers, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape.
The foundation of any strong healthcare system is a robust physician base. In Charles Town, the physician-to-patient ratio for primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer asthma management. The availability of pulmonologists, specialists in lung diseases, is equally crucial. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, requires specialized care for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management. The presence and accessibility of these specialists significantly impact the Asthma Score. The analysis will investigate the actual numbers of PCPs and pulmonologists, comparing them to the population of 25414, and benchmarking against state and national averages to determine a preliminary score.
Beyond sheer numbers, the characteristics of primary care practices significantly influence the quality of asthma care. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive asthma action plans, and regularly monitor lung function contribute to better patient outcomes. Practices that integrate electronic health records (EHRs) are often better equipped to manage patient data, track medication adherence, and coordinate care with specialists. The analysis will examine the practices' commitment to these best practices, assigning points based on their adherence to established guidelines. The availability of in-house respiratory therapists or access to respiratory services is another crucial factor. These professionals play a vital role in educating patients on proper inhaler techniques, monitoring lung function, and providing support during asthma exacerbations.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve asthma care, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and increasing access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Practices that offer telemedicine consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, or virtual asthma education programs receive higher scores. The analysis will investigate the extent of telemedicine integration within local practices, assessing the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring tools, and online educational resources. The availability of these services directly impacts the Asthma Score.
The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression can worsen asthma symptoms, and the chronic nature of the condition can contribute to mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an essential component of a comprehensive asthma care system. The analysis will examine the availability of mental health services within primary care practices, such as on-site therapists or partnerships with mental health providers. The proximity and accessibility of mental health clinics and support groups are also critical factors. The integration of mental health services into the care model directly impacts the Asthma Score, reflecting the importance of holistic patient care.
Standout practices in Charles Town, those demonstrating a commitment to excellence in asthma care, deserve recognition. The analysis will identify practices that excel in specific areas, such as patient education, telemedicine adoption, or mental health integration. These practices serve as models for others, highlighting best practices and inspiring improvements across the healthcare landscape. The analysis will highlight these practices, providing specific examples of their innovative approaches to asthma management.
The Asthma Score will also consider the availability of urgent care facilities and emergency rooms in the area. Asthma exacerbations can require immediate medical attention, and the proximity and efficiency of these facilities are crucial for patient safety. The analysis will assess the wait times at local emergency rooms and urgent care centers, as well as their capacity to handle asthma-related emergencies.
The analysis will incorporate data from various sources, including public health databases, insurance provider directories, and practice websites. Patient reviews and testimonials will also be considered, providing valuable insights into the patient experience. The data will be synthesized to create a comprehensive Asthma Score, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in Charles Town.
The final Asthma Score will be presented as a numerical rating, accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology and the factors considered. The analysis will provide specific recommendations for improving asthma care in the area, such as promoting telemedicine adoption, increasing the availability of mental health resources, and encouraging practices to adopt best practices in asthma management. The analysis will also identify areas where further investigation is needed, such as the need for more data on physician-to-patient ratios or the impact of specific interventions on patient outcomes.
This comprehensive analysis provides a snapshot of the current state of asthma care in Charles Town. It serves as a valuable resource for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare landscape. It highlights areas for improvement and encourages collaboration to enhance the quality and accessibility of asthma care.
For a dynamic, visual representation of this data, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing healthcare data and identifying areas of need. Visit CartoChrome to explore the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Charles Town, WV.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like