The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25507, Ceredo, West Virginia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.89 percent of the residents in 25507 has some form of health insurance. 71.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 36.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25507 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 165 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25507. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 295 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 745 health care providers accessible to residents in 25507, Ceredo, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25507, Ceredo, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 99 |
---|---|
People Score | 79 |
Provider Score | 100 |
Hospital Score | 80 |
Travel Score | 56 |
25507 | Ceredo | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management within ZIP Code 25507, encompassing the town of Ceredo, West Virginia, presents a complex interplay of factors impacting patient care. To comprehensively analyze the situation, an “Asthma Score” framework is employed, evaluating various aspects of healthcare delivery and resource availability. This analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial for effective asthma control.
The initial assessment focuses on the physician-to-patient ratio. Ceredo, a relatively small community, likely faces challenges in this regard. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical determinant of asthma management success. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. The absence of specialized pulmonologists in the immediate vicinity necessitates patients traveling for specialized care, adding another layer of complexity. The Asthma Score would reflect this, acknowledging the potential strain on existing resources.
Examining standout practices within the area is essential. This involves identifying clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate a commitment to asthma management best practices. This includes a focus on patient education, regular monitoring of lung function, and personalized treatment plans. Practices that consistently utilize evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), would receive higher marks. The Asthma Score would scrutinize practices for their adherence to these guidelines, evaluating factors like asthma action plan utilization, the availability of peak flow meters, and patient education materials.
Telemedicine adoption emerges as a significant factor in the Asthma Score. Telemedicine offers a valuable tool to bridge geographical barriers and improve access to care, particularly for individuals with chronic conditions like asthma. Practices that embrace telemedicine for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education would be viewed favorably. This technology can facilitate remote monitoring of lung function, providing physicians with real-time data to adjust treatment plans as needed. The Asthma Score would assess the extent of telemedicine integration, considering factors like the availability of virtual consultations and remote monitoring capabilities.
The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is another crucial element. Asthma is often associated with anxiety and depression, which can exacerbate symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. The Asthma Score would evaluate the availability of mental health services within the community and the extent to which primary care practices screen patients for mental health concerns. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals would receive higher ratings. This aspect recognizes the interconnectedness of physical and mental well-being in asthma management.
The Asthma Score for Ceredo would also consider the availability of asthma-specific resources within the community. This includes access to asthma educators, support groups, and community health programs focused on asthma management. The presence of these resources can empower patients to take an active role in their care, leading to improved outcomes. The Asthma Score would assess the availability of these resources and their accessibility to patients.
Analyzing the quality of asthma care in Ceredo requires a nuanced approach. The Asthma Score would consider various factors, including the availability of resources, the quality of care provided by physicians, and the integration of technology. The score would reflect the challenges faced by the community and highlight areas where improvements are needed. The overall goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment of asthma management in the area, identifying strengths and weaknesses to inform strategies for improvement.
The analysis reveals that the Asthma Score for Ceredo, ZIP Code 25507, is likely impacted by several factors. The relatively small size of the community and its location may lead to challenges in physician-to-patient ratios. The availability of specialized pulmonologists is likely limited, requiring patients to travel for specialized care. Telemedicine adoption may be a key factor in improving access to care, particularly for those living in rural areas.
Standout practices, if any, would be those that prioritize patient education, utilize evidence-based guidelines, and integrate mental health resources into their care. The presence of asthma educators, support groups, and community health programs would also positively influence the Asthma Score. The overall score would reflect the community's ability to provide comprehensive asthma care, considering the availability of resources, the quality of care provided by physicians, and the integration of technology.
Ultimately, the Asthma Score provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of asthma management in Ceredo. It highlights areas where improvements are needed and identifies best practices that can be replicated. The score is a dynamic tool that can be used to track progress over time and to inform strategies for improving asthma care in the community. The score is not a single number but a composite of various factors, each contributing to the overall picture of asthma management.
To gain a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Ceredo, including physician locations, resource availability, and potential gaps in care, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a dynamic and interactive way to visualize the data used in the Asthma Score analysis, providing a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like