Asthma Score

25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia is 67 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.58 percent of the residents in 25521 has some form of health insurance. 48.34 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.20 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25521 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 161 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25521. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 129 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,167 health care providers accessible to residents in 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia

Asthma Score 26
People Score 37
Provider Score 67
Hospital Score 31
Travel Score 21

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

25521 Griffithsville West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia

Asthma management and primary care access are critical components of community health, especially in areas like Griffithsville, West Virginia (ZIP Code 25521). This analysis aims to assess the landscape of asthma care, focusing on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and related resources within this specific geographic area. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, evaluate telemedicine adoption, and assess the presence of mental health resources, all contributing to an "Asthma Score" reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of care.

The foundation of effective asthma management lies in accessible primary care. In Griffithsville, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. A low ratio, meaning a high number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times, reduced appointment frequency, and potentially compromised asthma control. Conversely, a favorable ratio allows for more personalized care, proactive management strategies, and better patient outcomes. Determining the exact ratio requires data on the number of active PCPs practicing within the 25521 ZIP code and the estimated population. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the West Virginia Board of Medicine can be used to estimate these figures.

Standout practices in asthma care often demonstrate a commitment to patient education, comprehensive asthma action plans, and proactive monitoring. These practices typically integrate evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). They might offer specialized asthma clinics, dedicated respiratory therapists, or patient support groups. Identifying these standout practices involves reviewing patient testimonials, analyzing online reviews, and potentially surveying local healthcare providers. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate consistently positive patient outcomes warrant higher marks in the "Asthma Score."

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for asthma management, particularly in rural areas where access to in-person care can be challenging. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of lung function. Its adoption rates within the 25521 ZIP code are a key consideration. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring devices, demonstrate a commitment to expanding access and improving patient convenience. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is also a crucial factor, as poor connectivity can hinder the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an essential component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, collaborate with mental health professionals, or provide referrals to mental health specialists receive higher marks. The presence of support groups, educational materials, and resources for managing stress and anxiety further enhances the "Asthma Score."

Assessing the "Asthma Score" involves a multi-faceted approach. We need to gather data on physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, evaluate telemedicine adoption, and assess the availability of mental health resources. Each of these factors contributes to the overall score, reflecting the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of asthma care within the 25521 ZIP code.

The analysis of physician-to-patient ratios is paramount. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of PCPs, negatively impacts the score. Conversely, a favorable ratio improves the score, suggesting greater access to care. This is a fundamental metric in assessing the overall healthcare landscape.

Identifying standout practices is also critical. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based care, patient education, and proactive management strategies receive higher marks. This involves reviewing patient testimonials, analyzing online reviews, and assessing the practice's adherence to asthma guidelines.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring, demonstrate a commitment to expanding access and improving patient convenience. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is also considered.

The presence of mental health resources is also essential. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, collaborate with mental health professionals, or provide referrals to mental health specialists receive higher marks. This reflects a commitment to comprehensive patient care.

Combining these factors, we can develop an "Asthma Score" that reflects the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in Griffithsville. This score provides a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.

The "Asthma Score" is not just a number; it's a reflection of the community's commitment to the health and well-being of its residents. It highlights areas where improvements are needed, such as increasing the number of PCPs, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding access to mental health resources.

The goal is to create a healthier community where individuals with asthma can thrive. By understanding the current state of asthma care, we can work towards improving access, quality, and outcomes. The "Asthma Score" serves as a roadmap for achieving this goal.

The analysis provides a snapshot of the current healthcare landscape in Griffithsville. It's a starting point for further investigation and action. By identifying areas for improvement, we can work towards creating a healthier community for all.

Understanding the distribution of healthcare resources, including PCPs, specialist, and pharmacies, is crucial. Visualizing this data on a map can reveal patterns and disparities that might not be apparent from raw data alone. Mapping the location of healthcare providers, along with demographic data and asthma prevalence rates, can help identify areas with the greatest need for resources.

The "Asthma Score" analysis can be enhanced by incorporating geographic information systems (GIS) and mapping tools. Visualizing the data on a map can reveal patterns and disparities that might not be apparent from raw data alone. Mapping the location of healthcare providers, along with demographic data and asthma prevalence rates, can help identify areas with the greatest need for resources.

To delve deeper into the data and visualize the healthcare landscape in Griffithsville and beyond, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping and data visualization tools that can help you understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and identify areas for improvement.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia

You may also like

25523, Hamlin, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 2.79 Miles

Total Population:

25571, West Hamlin, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 6.91 Miles

Total Population:

25501, Alkol, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 7.68 Miles

Total Population:

25564, Sod, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 7.96 Miles

Total Population:

25540, Midkiff, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 8.95 Miles

Total Population:

25506, Branchland, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 9.18 Miles

Total Population:

25510, Culloden, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 9.95 Miles

Total Population:

25565, Spurlockville, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 9.99 Miles

Total Population:

25567, Sumerco, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25521: 10.20 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 25521, Griffithsville, West Virginia