Asthma Score

25535, Lavalette, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.02 percent of the residents in 25535 has some form of health insurance. 24.94 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25535 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 954 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25535. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 311 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,090 health care providers accessible to residents in 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia.

Health Scores in 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia

Asthma Score 98
People Score 73
Provider Score 98
Hospital Score 63
Travel Score 66

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

25535 Lavalette West Virginia
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts the health and well-being of individuals, especially in areas with environmental factors or limited access to quality healthcare. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services within the ZIP code 25535, encompassing Lavalette, West Virginia, with a specific focus on asthma care. We will assess the "Asthma Score" for local doctors, considering factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in managing asthma effectively.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of healthcare accessibility. In Lavalette, the ratio presents a crucial challenge. Determining the exact number of primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code is the initial step. However, even with accurate data, the size of the population served in the area is a variable that needs to be factored in. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised care quality. Areas with a lower ratio generally offer better access, allowing for more comprehensive patient management, which is particularly important for a chronic condition like asthma.

Identifying "standout practices" requires evaluating several factors. These include the experience and specialization of the physicians, the availability of on-site diagnostic tools like pulmonary function tests, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data management, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma education, offering resources on triggers, medication management, and emergency protocols, are particularly noteworthy. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in asthma-related research or quality improvement initiatives would score higher. Researching local reviews and patient testimonials is a critical part of this assessment.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in modern healthcare, especially for managing chronic conditions. Its adoption within the Lavalette primary care landscape is an important factor. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of symptoms, and medication refills through telehealth platforms can significantly improve patient convenience and adherence to treatment plans. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for asthma patients, allowing for regular check-ins, prompt responses to exacerbations, and education on self-management techniques. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services and the ease of use of the platforms are critical elements of the "Asthma Score" analysis.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, potentially worsening symptom control and quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through referrals is essential. Practices that integrate mental health screenings, provide access to therapists or counselors, or collaborate with mental health specialists would receive a higher score. This integrated approach acknowledges the holistic needs of asthma patients, promoting better overall health outcomes.

Analyzing the specific practices in Lavalette, West Virginia, involves a granular approach. We must investigate each practice's website, if one exists, and other online presences, if any, to determine the services they offer. We must check their participation in insurance networks, their hours of operation, and their patient acceptance policies. We must examine patient reviews, if available, to gauge patient satisfaction and identify any recurring concerns. This detailed investigation allows for a more accurate "Asthma Score" ranking.

The "Asthma Score" for each doctor in 25535 is a composite measure, reflecting the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of the practice, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The score would be calculated based on a weighted system, with each factor contributing to the overall assessment. For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, a strong emphasis on asthma education, robust telemedicine capabilities, and integrated mental health support would receive a high score. Conversely, a practice with limited resources and a less comprehensive approach would receive a lower score.

The data gathering process requires a combination of online research, phone calls to practices, and potentially, interviews with local healthcare providers and patients. This information must be updated regularly, as healthcare services and practices are always evolving. The final "Asthma Score" ranking would provide a valuable tool for patients in Lavalette, helping them make informed decisions about their healthcare and find the best possible asthma care.

For instance, consider a hypothetical practice in Lavalette with a physician-to-patient ratio that is slightly above the national average. This practice has a well-established EHR system, offers on-site pulmonary function tests, and has a dedicated asthma educator on staff. They are also beginning to implement telemedicine for follow-up appointments. However, they have limited mental health resources and rely primarily on referrals to external specialists. This practice might receive a moderate "Asthma Score," reflecting its strengths and weaknesses.

Another practice might be a smaller, newer practice with a lower physician-to-patient ratio. They may not have all the resources of the larger practice, but they are committed to patient education and have a strong focus on personalized care. They are also actively working to integrate mental health services. This practice could receive a similar or even higher "Asthma Score," depending on the weighting of the different factors.

The dynamic nature of healthcare requires continuous monitoring and evaluation. The "Asthma Score" ranking should be updated regularly to reflect changes in practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. This ensures that the information remains relevant and useful for patients. The ranking would also provide valuable feedback to healthcare providers, highlighting areas for improvement and promoting best practices in asthma care.

In conclusion, the "Asthma Score" analysis for doctors in ZIP code 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia, is a complex process that requires a comprehensive assessment of various factors. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, we can provide a valuable tool for patients seeking quality asthma care. This information can also help identify areas where healthcare services can be improved.

To visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and the "Asthma Score" rankings, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide an interactive and intuitive way to explore healthcare data, allowing you to easily identify the best options for asthma care in your area. Explore the possibilities.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia

You may also like

25570, Wayne, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 6.19 Miles

Total Population:

25530, Kenova, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 7.16 Miles

Total Population:

25507, Ceredo, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 8.71 Miles

Total Population:

25555, Prichard, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 9.51 Miles

Total Population:

25504, Barboursville, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 10.40 Miles

Total Population:

25559, Salt Rock, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 10.68 Miles

Total Population:

25512, East Lynn, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 10.73 Miles

Total Population:

25517, Genoa, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 13.57 Miles

Total Population:

25545, Ona, West Virginia
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 25535: 14.14 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 25535, Lavalette, West Virginia