The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25651, Wharncliffe, West Virginia is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25651 has some form of health insurance. 78.16 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 23.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25651 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 83 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25651. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 104 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 667 health care providers accessible to residents in 25651, Wharncliffe, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25651, Wharncliffe, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 26 |
---|---|
People Score | 44 |
Provider Score | 50 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 17 |
25651 | Wharncliffe | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on asthma management and primary care accessibility within the designated area. We will examine the landscape of healthcare providers in ZIP Code 25651, specifically Wharncliffe, West Virginia, to assess the availability of resources for asthma sufferers. This includes an evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, the identification of noteworthy practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health support, all crucial elements in effective asthma care.
Wharncliffe, nestled in the heart of West Virginia, presents unique challenges to healthcare delivery. The geographic isolation and economic factors can influence the availability and accessibility of medical services. Understanding the specific context of this community is paramount to accurately assess the quality of asthma care.
Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio in ZIP Code 25651 is a critical first step. This ratio provides a baseline understanding of the potential workload for each physician and the overall availability of medical care. A lower ratio, meaning more physicians per capita, generally indicates better access to care. However, this figure alone doesn't paint the whole picture. The type of physicians available, their specializations, and their willingness to accept new patients all play a significant role. Data from state medical boards and healthcare databases will be needed to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio, which is crucial for determining the overall accessibility of care.
Identifying standout practices within the area requires a deeper dive. We need to look beyond the raw numbers and examine the quality of care provided. This involves considering factors like the expertise of the physicians in asthma management, the availability of specialized equipment for diagnosis and treatment, and the patient satisfaction levels. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs, offer comprehensive care plans, and demonstrate a commitment to patient empowerment are likely to be considered superior. Reviews and ratings from patients, as well as any awards or recognitions the practices have received, would be valuable data points.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. It can bridge the gap between patients and specialists, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption among the primary care physicians in Wharncliffe is vital. Do they offer virtual consultations for asthma management? Do they utilize remote monitoring tools to track patient symptoms and adjust treatment plans? Practices that embrace telemedicine can significantly improve the accessibility and convenience of asthma care for patients in this area.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of chronic illnesses like asthma, but they are essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health support within the local healthcare system is therefore crucial. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who can provide support and treatment for patients struggling with the psychological effects of asthma. Does the primary care network in Wharncliffe have established partnerships with mental health providers? Are mental health services integrated into the asthma care plans? These are important questions to answer.
To provide a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, we need to create a scoring system. This system would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. Each category would be assigned a weight based on its importance. For instance, the physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted at 20%, the quality of care at 40%, telemedicine adoption at 20%, and mental health resources at 20%.
Each practice would then be evaluated based on these criteria. The evaluation of quality of care would include factors like the physicians’ expertise, the availability of specialized equipment, patient satisfaction, and participation in asthma education programs. Telemedicine adoption would be assessed by determining if virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and other telehealth services are offered. The availability of mental health resources would be gauged by looking at the presence of mental health professionals within the practice or the existence of referral partnerships.
The ‘Asthma Score’ for each practice would be calculated by multiplying the score for each criterion by its weight and summing the results. The practices with the highest scores would be considered the best in terms of asthma care. The overall ‘Asthma Score’ for the area would be determined by averaging the scores of all the practices. This score would provide a snapshot of the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in Wharncliffe.
This analysis also needs to account for the specific needs of the population in Wharncliffe. Considering the demographic makeup of the community, including age, socioeconomic status, and cultural factors, is important. This will help to identify any disparities in access to care and tailor the recommendations to the specific needs of the residents.
The final ‘Asthma Score’ analysis would provide a valuable resource for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It would enable patients to make informed decisions about their care, help healthcare providers identify areas for improvement, and inform policymakers about the need for additional resources or interventions. The analysis could also be used to track progress over time and evaluate the effectiveness of any interventions implemented.
The results of this analysis, when visualized geographically, can be incredibly powerful. To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Wharncliffe and to visualize the data, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows you to explore the distribution of healthcare resources, analyze physician density, and visualize patient outcomes in the context of geographic data.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like