Health Scores Near 25836, Eccles, West Virginia
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25836, Eccles, West Virginia is 88 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25836 has some form of health insurance. 54.60 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.14 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25836 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 303 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25836. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 256 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,706 health care providers accessible to residents in 25836, Eccles, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25836, Eccles, West Virginia
| Asthma Score | 78 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 31 |
| Provider Score | 88 |
| Hospital Score | 32 |
| Travel Score | 83 |
| 25836 | Eccles | West Virginia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis will focus on providing insights into asthma care accessibility and quality within the specified geographic parameters.
**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25836 and Primary Care Availability in Eccles**
Evaluating asthma care in ZIP Code 25836, encompassing the Eccles area, requires a multifaceted approach. We need to consider the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), their specific expertise in asthma management, the support infrastructure available, and the integration of modern technologies. This analysis will attempt to provide a comprehensive overview, though limitations in publicly available data may necessitate generalizations.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Eccles, and the surrounding ZIP Code, is a critical factor. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can significantly impact access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma. Determining the exact ratio requires accessing local demographic data and cross-referencing it with the number of practicing PCPs. Publicly available resources, such as the US Census Bureau and state medical licensing boards, are vital for this data gathering. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delays in diagnosis or treatment adjustments.
Furthermore, the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP Code is crucial. Even with an adequate overall ratio, if physicians are clustered in one part of the area, residents in other locations might face significant travel barriers. This geographic disparity can exacerbate health inequities. Analyzing the physical locations of medical practices within the 25836 ZIP Code is essential. This analysis should account for the presence of any specialist care, such as pulmonologists, as well.
Identifying standout practices requires evaluating several criteria. These include the adoption of evidence-based asthma management guidelines, patient satisfaction scores, and the availability of ancillary services. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive asthma action plans, and actively monitor patient outcomes are likely to provide superior care. Patient testimonials, if available, can also offer valuable insights into the quality of care provided. Assessing the availability of after-hours care and emergency services is also vital for patients managing a chronic condition.
Telemedicine adoption is another key consideration. Telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online educational resources are demonstrating a commitment to patient-centered care. The integration of telehealth can also facilitate more frequent check-ins and timely adjustments to treatment plans, ultimately leading to better asthma control. Evaluating the availability of telehealth services within the specified ZIP Code should be a priority.
The connection between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, and these conditions can significantly impact asthma control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is an important factor in assessing the quality of asthma care. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Assessing the presence of mental health resources within the practices in the area is crucial.
Analyzing the availability of asthma-specific educational resources is also important. Patient education is a cornerstone of effective asthma management. Practices that provide educational materials, such as brochures, online videos, or group classes, empower patients to actively participate in their care. These resources should cover topics such as medication use, trigger avoidance, and recognizing asthma symptoms. The availability of these resources can significantly improve patient outcomes.
The presence of support staff, such as asthma educators and respiratory therapists, can enhance the quality of asthma care. These professionals can provide specialized education, assist with medication management, and monitor lung function. Practices that have these support staff members are better positioned to provide comprehensive asthma care. Their presence can improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on PCPs.
Evaluating the insurance landscape is another important factor. The acceptance of various insurance plans and the availability of financial assistance programs can impact access to care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer financial counseling services can improve access for patients with limited financial resources. The ability to navigate the complexities of the insurance system is crucial.
The use of electronic health records (EHRs) can improve care coordination and data management. EHRs facilitate the sharing of patient information among healthcare providers, leading to more informed decision-making. Practices that utilize EHRs are better equipped to manage patient data and track outcomes. This can improve the overall quality of care.
Furthermore, assessing the availability of asthma-specific programs and initiatives can provide additional insights. These programs might include asthma clinics, community outreach programs, or collaborations with local organizations. The presence of these programs can indicate a commitment to improving asthma care within the community.
In conclusion, evaluating asthma care in ZIP Code 25836 and primary care availability in Eccles requires a thorough assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of individual practices, the integration of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the availability of support staff. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for identifying areas of strength and weakness and for developing strategies to improve asthma care access and quality.
For a visual representation of physician locations, practice specializations, and other relevant data, we recommend exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide a detailed geographic overview of healthcare resources in the area, facilitating a more informed understanding of asthma care accessibility.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
