25848, Glen Rogers, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 25848, Glen Rogers, West Virginia is 91 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.35 percent of the residents in 25848 has some form of health insurance. 53.51 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 47.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25848 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 32 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25848. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 12 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,594 health care providers accessible to residents in 25848, Glen Rogers, West Virginia.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25848 and Primary Care Availability in Glen Rogers**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality within a specific geographic area like ZIP code 25848, encompassing Glen Rogers, requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider not just the raw number of physicians but also the quality of care they provide, their integration of technology, and the availability of supporting services, particularly those relevant to managing a chronic condition like asthma. This analysis will provide an asthma score assessment, focusing on primary care access and related factors.

The first crucial element is physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, is a significant barrier to care. In ZIP code 25848, a rural area, this is likely a challenge. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources must be cross-referenced with physician directories and insurance provider networks to determine the actual ratio. This initial step is critical for understanding the baseline level of access. A lower ratio, by itself, would negatively impact the asthma score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the types of physicians available are vital. Are there enough primary care physicians (PCPs)? PCPs are the gatekeepers to healthcare, managing chronic conditions and coordinating specialist referrals. In asthma management, they are essential. The availability of pulmonologists, specialists in lung diseases, is also important, especially for patients with severe asthma. The presence or absence of these specialists directly impacts the asthma score.

Identifying standout practices within the area is another key component of the analysis. Are there any clinics or practices that have demonstrated excellence in asthma care? This can be assessed through several metrics. Patient reviews and testimonials provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Examining the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, such as those from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), is crucial. Practices that consistently adhere to these guidelines and demonstrate positive patient outcomes would receive a higher score.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access care remotely. This is particularly beneficial for asthma patients, who can receive virtual consultations, medication management, and education on asthma triggers and control. The degree of telemedicine adoption by physicians in ZIP code 25848, including the types of services offered and the technology used, will significantly influence the asthma score. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine will receive a higher score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are crucial. Asthma can be a significant source of stress and anxiety, and mental health issues can worsen asthma symptoms. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, and the integration of mental health services into primary care practices, are therefore critical. Practices that offer or have referral pathways to mental health support will receive a higher score, as it reflects a more holistic approach to patient care.

Accessibility of pharmacies and medication availability must also be considered. Asthma medications, including inhalers and other devices, must be readily available. The presence of local pharmacies and their ability to fill prescriptions promptly is essential. Practices that actively assist patients with medication adherence, such as providing education on proper inhaler technique and offering medication reminders, will receive a higher score.

The asthma score itself will be a composite metric, reflecting all these factors. The score will be higher for areas with: a favorable physician-to-patient ratio; a strong presence of PCPs and pulmonologists; practices demonstrating excellence in asthma care; high telemedicine adoption; robust mental health resources; and easy access to pharmacies and medications. Each factor will be weighted according to its importance in asthma management. For instance, physician-to-patient ratio and specialist availability might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, though telemedicine is still important.

The quality of primary care availability in Glen Rogers is a key subset of this analysis. Glen Rogers is a small community, and its access to primary care physicians will directly affect the asthma score. The analysis will specifically focus on the number of PCPs serving Glen Rogers residents, the distance patients must travel to access care, and the availability of transportation options. The availability of after-hours care and weekend appointments will also be considered.

The analysis will also examine the integration of asthma education into primary care. Are patients provided with education on asthma triggers, medication management, and self-management techniques? Practices that prioritize patient education will receive a higher score, as this is a critical component of asthma control.

The analysis will not only provide a score but also identify areas for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is low, the analysis will suggest strategies for increasing access to care, such as recruiting more physicians or expanding telemedicine services. If mental health resources are lacking, the analysis will recommend establishing partnerships with mental health providers or integrating mental health services into primary care practices.

The final asthma score will be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It will provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in ZIP code 25848 and will inform efforts to improve asthma care. The score can also be used to compare healthcare access and quality across different geographic areas.

The analysis will be a dynamic process. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies and treatment options emerging. The asthma score will be updated regularly to reflect these changes and to ensure that it remains a relevant and accurate assessment of healthcare access and quality. This will ensure that patients and providers have the most current information available.

For a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, the location of physicians, and the accessibility of primary care services in ZIP code 25848 and beyond, explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can visually represent the data analyzed, providing a comprehensive understanding of healthcare access and quality in the region.