26059, Triadelphia, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 26059, Triadelphia, West Virginia is 88 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.26 percent of the residents in 26059 has some form of health insurance. 40.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26059 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 457 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26059. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 478 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 840 health care providers accessible to residents in 26059, Triadelphia, West Virginia.

Asthma management in the Triadelphia area, specifically within the 26059 ZIP code, presents a complex landscape. An "Asthma Score" analysis, though not a formal, standardized metric, can be constructed by evaluating several key factors impacting patient care. This analysis aims to provide an overview of the available resources, physician accessibility, and overall quality of care, ultimately influencing the ability of individuals to effectively manage their asthma.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial starting point. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts asthma management. PCPs often serve as the initial point of contact for asthma diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors, can lead to delayed appointments, longer wait times, and ultimately, less frequent monitoring of asthma symptoms. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access to care. This analysis would require data on the number of PCPs practicing within the 26059 ZIP code and the estimated population. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and state medical licensing boards could be utilized to estimate these figures.

Standout practices in the area can significantly influence the Asthma Score. Identifying practices that demonstrate excellence in asthma management is essential. This involves researching practices that prioritize asthma education for patients, including the proper use of inhalers, trigger avoidance strategies, and recognizing early warning signs of exacerbations. Practices that offer comprehensive asthma action plans, tailored to individual patient needs, would be considered high-performing. Furthermore, practices that actively monitor patient outcomes, track exacerbation rates, and make adjustments to treatment plans based on data analysis, would also score favorably. This evaluation would require examining practice websites, patient reviews, and potentially contacting practices directly to inquire about their asthma management protocols.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. For asthma patients, telemedicine offers several advantages. It allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and symptom monitoring. This can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, especially for patients with stable asthma. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring capabilities, would contribute positively to the Asthma Score. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves researching practice websites, inquiring about telehealth services, and evaluating the availability of remote monitoring devices.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they play a significant role. Asthma can be a chronic condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Anxiety, depression, and stress can exacerbate asthma symptoms and lead to poor adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health support is crucial. This includes access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who specialize in chronic illness management. The analysis would need to assess the availability of mental health professionals in the Triadelphia area, including their proximity to primary care practices and their willingness to collaborate on patient care. This information can be gathered through local directories, healthcare provider websites, and community resources.

The integration of these factors – physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – allows for the construction of a comprehensive Asthma Score analysis. The score itself would be a qualitative assessment, based on the evaluation of these factors. A high score would indicate a favorable environment for asthma management, with good access to care, comprehensive services, and supportive resources. A low score would suggest areas for improvement, such as a shortage of physicians, limited access to telemedicine, or a lack of mental health support.

The analysis would also consider the impact of primary care availability in Triadelphia. The accessibility of primary care physicians is paramount to effective asthma management. The number of PCPs, their geographic distribution, and their acceptance of insurance plans all contribute to accessibility. Areas with a high concentration of PCPs, convenient locations, and broad insurance coverage would be considered more accessible. This assessment would involve mapping the locations of PCPs within the Triadelphia area, analyzing their insurance acceptance policies, and evaluating the availability of transportation options for patients.

Furthermore, the analysis would need to consider the availability of specialized asthma care. While PCPs often manage asthma, some patients require the expertise of pulmonologists or allergists. The proximity of these specialists to the 26059 ZIP code, the ease of referral processes, and the availability of advanced diagnostic and treatment options are all important considerations. Assessing this aspect would involve identifying the locations of pulmonologists and allergists in the area, researching their referral policies, and evaluating their access to specialized equipment and treatments.

The overall goal of this Asthma Score analysis is to provide a nuanced understanding of the asthma care landscape in Triadelphia. It is not intended to be a definitive ranking, but rather a framework for evaluating the resources and challenges faced by asthma patients in the area. The analysis can serve as a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers seeking to improve asthma management and patient outcomes.

For a more detailed and visually informative understanding of the healthcare landscape in Triadelphia, including the locations of healthcare providers, accessibility factors, and potential areas for improvement, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a comprehensive view of the area's resources, allowing for a deeper understanding of the factors influencing asthma management.