The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 26291, Slatyfork, West Virginia is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 74.49 percent of the residents in 26291 has some form of health insurance. 27.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26291 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26291. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 27 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 52 health care providers accessible to residents in 26291, Slatyfork, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26291, Slatyfork, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 81 |
---|---|
People Score | 98 |
Provider Score | 44 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 44 |
26291 | Slatyfork | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of asthma care within ZIP Code 26291, encompassing the Slatyfork area, requires a multifaceted approach, evaluating not just the presence of physicians but also the quality of care, access to resources, and the overall healthcare infrastructure. A comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ would consider several key factors, moving beyond simple physician counts to assess the real-world experience of asthma patients.
The initial hurdle in Slatyfork, and indeed much of rural West Virginia, is primary care availability. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. Nationally, the recommended ratio is around 1:1,300. However, in many rural areas, this ratio is significantly higher, potentially exceeding 1:3,000 or even 1:4,000. This scarcity directly impacts asthma care. Patients may face long wait times for appointments, limiting their ability to receive timely diagnoses, treatment adjustments, and preventative care. The limited availability also strains the existing healthcare providers, potentially leading to burnout and reduced quality of care.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians is crucial. Are the available doctors concentrated in a single clinic, or are they spread throughout the community? The geographic accessibility of care is a significant factor, particularly in a region with challenging terrain and limited transportation options. Patients in remote areas may struggle to reach even a single primary care physician, making regular asthma management difficult.
Within the existing primary care landscape, assessing the specific expertise and resources available for asthma management is essential. Does the practice have a dedicated asthma specialist, or is asthma care integrated into general primary care? The presence of certified asthma educators, respiratory therapists, and access to pulmonary function testing (PFT) significantly improves the quality of asthma care. Practices with robust asthma management protocols, including written action plans, patient education materials, and regular follow-up appointments, would score higher.
Telemedicine adoption is a crucial element in improving asthma care in underserved areas. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care, especially for those in remote locations or with limited mobility. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of asthma symptoms, and medication management through telehealth platforms would receive a higher score. The integration of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data directly to the physician, can further enhance asthma management.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma care, but they are essential. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively affect treatment adherence. Practices that offer access to mental health professionals, either on-site or through referral networks, would score higher. The integration of mental health screening into routine asthma care is another positive indicator.
Identifying standout practices within ZIP Code 26291 requires a deep dive into the specifics of each clinic. This would involve reviewing patient testimonials, assessing the practice's commitment to patient education, and evaluating its use of technology. Practices with a strong focus on patient-centered care, clear communication, and a proactive approach to asthma management would stand out. The ability to quickly adapt to new guidelines and technologies is also a key indicator of a practice’s quality.
The ‘Asthma Score’ should also consider the availability of emergency services and hospital resources. The proximity of a hospital with a dedicated emergency department and respiratory care unit is crucial for managing asthma exacerbations. The presence of a hospital with specialized asthma care programs, such as pulmonary rehabilitation, would further enhance the score. The collaboration between primary care physicians and emergency medical services is also important.
Medication access is another critical factor. The affordability and availability of asthma medications, including both rescue inhalers and controller medications, directly impact a patient's ability to manage their condition. Practices that assist patients in navigating insurance coverage, medication assistance programs, and affordable options would receive a higher score. The practice’s ability to educate patients on proper inhaler technique and medication adherence is also important.
Community resources play a vital role in asthma care. The availability of support groups, asthma education programs, and environmental health initiatives can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs and partner with local organizations to raise awareness about asthma would score higher. The presence of clean air initiatives and efforts to address environmental triggers, such as mold and allergens, are also important.
Finally, the ‘Asthma Score’ should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. The adoption of new technologies, the availability of new medications, and changes in healthcare policies can all impact asthma care. The score should be a dynamic tool that is used to continuously improve the quality of care for asthma patients in Slatyfork and beyond.
The creation of a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ requires a data-driven approach, combining information from various sources, including physician directories, insurance claims data, patient surveys, and public health records. The score should be transparent and readily accessible to patients, allowing them to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
To visualize the healthcare landscape of Slatyfork and gain a deeper understanding of asthma care availability, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that allow you to visualize physician locations, healthcare resource distribution, and other relevant data points. This will help you better understand the challenges and opportunities in improving asthma care within ZIP Code 26291.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like