26348, Folsom, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 26348, Folsom, West Virginia is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.41 percent of the residents in 26348 has some form of health insurance. 70.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 43.87 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26348 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 96 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26348. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 111 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,311 health care providers accessible to residents in 26348, Folsom, West Virginia.

Analyzing asthma care accessibility and quality within a specific geographic area requires a multifaceted approach. For this analysis, we will evaluate the hypothetical scenario of "doctors in ZIP Code 26348" and "primary care availability in Folsom," focusing on an "Asthma Score" framework. This framework will encompass physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of comprehensive asthma management.

The Asthma Score, in this context, is not a standardized metric but a conceptual tool for evaluating the overall landscape of asthma care. It considers several factors, assigning relative weights based on their impact on patient outcomes and access. The score will be higher for areas with better access to care, a higher quality of care, and more comprehensive support systems.

Let's begin with "doctors in ZIP Code 26348." We will assume this is a defined geographic area, and the initial step would be to ascertain the exact number of primary care physicians (PCPs), pulmonologists, and allergists practicing within the zip code. This data, coupled with the population of the area, allows us to calculate physician-to-patient ratios. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to better access and a higher potential Asthma Score.

Furthermore, we need to assess the distribution of these specialists. Are they concentrated in one area, or are they dispersed throughout the zip code, providing better access to all residents? We would examine the practices' acceptance of insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, to determine accessibility for diverse patient populations. The presence of specialized asthma clinics or centers of excellence would significantly boost the Asthma Score. These centers often offer comprehensive services, including advanced diagnostic tools, specialized treatment plans, and patient education programs.

Next, we will evaluate “primary care availability in Folsom.” The same principles apply here. We need to determine the number of PCPs serving the Folsom population. The physician-to-patient ratio is critical. Are there enough PCPs to meet the community’s needs, or are patients facing long wait times for appointments? This directly impacts the ability to receive timely asthma diagnoses and treatment adjustments.

We must identify any standout practices in both areas. These practices might be recognized for their patient-centered care, innovative approaches to asthma management, or exceptional patient outcomes. We could look for practices that have received awards or recognition for their quality of care, patient satisfaction, or adherence to asthma guidelines. Reviews and testimonials from patients can provide valuable insights into the quality of care and the patient experience.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important in asthma management. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients remotely, and provide medication refills through telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices with robust telemedicine programs would receive a higher Asthma Score. This includes the availability of virtual monitoring tools, such as peak flow meters and symptom trackers, integrated into the telemedicine platform.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical aspect of asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care programs would receive a higher Asthma Score. This could include on-site mental health professionals, referrals to mental health specialists, or educational resources on managing the psychological impact of asthma.

In both ZIP Code 26348 and Folsom, we would also analyze the availability of asthma education programs. These programs empower patients to manage their condition effectively, reducing hospitalizations and improving quality of life. The presence of certified asthma educators, patient support groups, and educational materials would contribute positively to the Asthma Score. The availability of these resources in multiple languages would further enhance the score, reflecting inclusivity and accessibility.

We would also assess the practices' commitment to preventive care. This includes the implementation of asthma action plans, regular check-ups, and vaccinations. Practices that actively promote preventive care and educate patients on environmental triggers and avoidance strategies would be rated higher.

In determining the Asthma Score, we would weigh each factor based on its impact on patient outcomes. Physician-to-patient ratios, access to specialists, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would all be weighted significantly. The presence of standout practices, asthma education programs, and a commitment to preventive care would also contribute to the overall score.

Finally, the Asthma Score is a dynamic measure. It would need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as new practices opening, the adoption of new technologies, or changes in insurance coverage. This ongoing evaluation ensures that the Asthma Score remains a relevant and useful tool for assessing the quality and accessibility of asthma care.

To visualize and analyze the data related to doctors in ZIP Code 26348 and primary care availability in Folsom, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician distribution, practice locations, and other relevant data, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the asthma care landscape. Explore the power of geospatial analysis with CartoChrome maps to gain deeper insights into healthcare accessibility and quality.