26521, Blacksville, West Virginia Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 26521, Blacksville, West Virginia is 88 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.46 percent of the residents in 26521 has some form of health insurance. 38.14 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 92.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26521 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 10 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 65 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26521. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 35 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 7,149 health care providers accessible to residents in 26521, Blacksville, West Virginia.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 26521 and Primary Care in Blacksville

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care services, specifically focusing on asthma management, within ZIP Code 26521, which encompasses the town of Blacksville, West Virginia. The goal is to provide an “Asthma Score” assessment, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in comprehensive asthma care.

Blacksville, a rural community, faces unique challenges in healthcare access. The geographical isolation and potential socioeconomic factors contribute to the complexity of delivering quality medical services. Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, requires consistent monitoring and management to prevent exacerbations and maintain a good quality of life. Therefore, this analysis examines the landscape of healthcare provision in this specific area, focusing on the elements most relevant to asthma patients.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of healthcare accessibility. In rural areas, this ratio often suffers compared to urban centers. Assessing the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists (e.g., pulmonologists, allergists) practicing within or serving the 26521 ZIP code is essential. A low ratio suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, which is critical for asthma patients needing regular check-ups and urgent care when experiencing a flare-up. Publicly available data from sources like the West Virginia Board of Medicine and the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with information from local healthcare providers, can help determine this ratio. A thorough evaluation would account for the total population of 26521, including age demographics, to accurately reflect the demand for primary care services.

Identifying standout practices is another crucial aspect of the analysis. This involves examining the quality of care offered by the existing medical facilities. Factors to consider include the availability of asthma-specific protocols, the use of evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and offer readily accessible follow-up care are likely to receive higher scores. Furthermore, the presence of certified asthma educators within a practice significantly enhances the quality of care, as these professionals can provide specialized training and support to patients. Investigating the accreditation status of local healthcare facilities, such as those from the Joint Commission or other reputable organizations, also provides valuable insights into their quality standards.

Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role in healthcare, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine offers a convenient way for patients to access medical advice, medication refills, and even remote monitoring of their asthma symptoms. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within the primary care practices serving 26521 is essential. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring devices (e.g., peak flow meters with digital data transmission), and online patient portals are likely to receive higher scores. The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who have difficulty traveling to in-person appointments.

The connection between asthma and mental health is well-documented. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, and these conditions can worsen asthma symptoms. Therefore, evaluating the availability of mental health resources within the primary care practices and the broader community is crucial. Practices that offer integrated behavioral health services, either through on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, are likely to receive higher scores. The presence of support groups, educational programs, and resources for managing stress and anxiety can also contribute to better asthma outcomes. A comprehensive analysis would investigate the availability of mental health professionals, the acceptance of insurance, and the accessibility of these resources for patients in the 26521 area.

The Asthma Score assessment would be a composite score, incorporating the factors discussed above. Each factor would be weighted based on its importance in asthma management. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the presence of certified asthma educators might be given higher weights than telemedicine adoption, depending on the specific needs of the community. The score would be presented on a scale, allowing for a clear and concise evaluation of the healthcare landscape in 26521. This score would not only reflect the current state of healthcare services but also identify areas for improvement.

The analysis would also consider the specific challenges faced by the Blacksville community. These challenges may include transportation limitations, limited access to internet connectivity (affecting telemedicine adoption), and socioeconomic factors that can impact access to healthcare. Understanding these challenges is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve asthma care.

The final Asthma Score would be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It would provide patients with information to make informed decisions about their healthcare. It would allow healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement and to develop strategies to enhance their services. Finally, it would provide policymakers with data to guide resource allocation and to support initiatives that improve access to care.

The analysis would conclude with recommendations for improvement. These recommendations might include strategies to increase the number of PCPs and specialists in the area, promote the adoption of telemedicine, and enhance the availability of mental health resources. It might also suggest the development of community-based programs to educate patients about asthma management and to provide support.

The analysis, however, is only as good as the data available. Publicly available data sources can be limited, and it may be necessary to collect data directly from healthcare providers through surveys or interviews. The accuracy of the Asthma Score would depend on the quality and completeness of the data collected.

Finally, the ultimate goal of this analysis is to improve the lives of asthma patients in Blacksville and surrounding areas. By providing a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape, this analysis aims to empower patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to work together to create a healthier community.

**Explore the healthcare landscape of 26521 and beyond with CartoChrome maps. Gain a visual understanding of physician locations, healthcare resource availability, and more. Visit CartoChrome today!**