The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 26755, Rio, West Virginia is 8 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 26755 has some form of health insurance. 53.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.87 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26755 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 176 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26755. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 101 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 199 health care providers accessible to residents in 26755, Rio, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26755, Rio, West Virginia
Asthma Score | 34 |
---|---|
People Score | 76 |
Provider Score | 8 |
Hospital Score | 52 |
Travel Score | 34 |
26755 | Rio | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis provides an assessment of asthma care quality and primary care accessibility within the designated geographic parameters: doctors in ZIP Code 26755 and primary care availability in Rio, West Virginia. This analysis, termed an “Asthma Score” analysis, considers factors crucial to effective asthma management, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources.
ZIP Code 26755 encompasses a specific geographical area, and the number of physicians practicing within this zone is a critical starting point. Physician-to-patient ratios directly impact access to care. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per patient, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, a decline in the quality of care. Accurate data on the total number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists practicing within 26755 is essential. This data should be cross-referenced with the estimated population of the area to determine the physician-to-patient ratio. Publicly available data from sources like the West Virginia Board of Medicine and the U.S. Census Bureau would be primary sources for this information.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of the practices themselves must be considered. Identifying “standout practices” involves evaluating several factors. These include the availability of board-certified pulmonologists, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient patient management, and the implementation of asthma-specific care protocols. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), would be considered highly desirable. Patient reviews, where available, can also provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the overall patient experience. Practices that offer comprehensive asthma education programs for patients and their families would score favorably.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor in the Asthma Score analysis. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care, especially in rural areas like Rio. Practices that offer telehealth consultations for asthma management, including medication adjustments, symptom monitoring, and patient education, are considered to be providing a more accessible and convenient service. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data directly to the physician, would further enhance the score. The ease of scheduling telehealth appointments and the technical support provided to patients are also important considerations.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but vital component of asthma care. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact a patient’s mental well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress can exacerbate asthma symptoms and reduce the effectiveness of treatment. Practices that screen patients for mental health issues, provide access to mental health professionals, or collaborate with mental health providers would receive a higher score. The availability of support groups or educational resources on the connection between asthma and mental health is also beneficial. The integration of mental health services into the overall asthma care plan is a key indicator of a patient-centered approach.
Rio, West Virginia, is a small community, and the availability of primary care is a significant factor in the overall Asthma Score. The accessibility of PCPs is crucial for initial diagnosis, ongoing management, and the coordination of care with specialists. The physical location of primary care clinics, their hours of operation, and their acceptance of various insurance plans are essential factors. The proximity of these clinics to residents of 26755, and the availability of transportation options, also influence accessibility.
The Asthma Score analysis would also consider the presence of emergency medical services (EMS) and their capacity to handle asthma-related emergencies. The response time of EMS to asthma exacerbations and the availability of pre-hospital asthma treatment protocols are important factors. The proximity of hospitals with emergency departments capable of treating asthma is also assessed.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the demographics of the population served. The prevalence of asthma can vary across different age groups, racial and ethnic groups, and socioeconomic statuses. Practices that demonstrate an understanding of these demographic variations and tailor their care accordingly would receive a higher score. The availability of translated materials and culturally sensitive care is also important.
The analysis would also consider the availability of asthma medications and devices. The ease with which patients can obtain their prescribed medications, whether through local pharmacies or mail-order services, is a factor. The availability of affordable medications and devices, including inhalers and nebulizers, is also critical. Practices that assist patients with accessing financial assistance programs for medications would receive a higher score.
In conclusion, the Asthma Score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 26755 and primary care availability in Rio requires a comprehensive assessment of various factors. These include physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the accessibility of primary care. A higher score indicates a healthcare environment that is better equipped to provide effective asthma management and improve patient outcomes.
To visualize this complex data and gain deeper insights into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and patient needs, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the Asthma Score analysis, highlighting areas with high and low scores, and revealing patterns and trends that may not be apparent through traditional data analysis. Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to uncover valuable insights and improve healthcare access in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like