The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 35071, Gardendale, Alabama is 97 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.75 percent of the residents in 35071 has some form of health insurance. 31.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.70 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35071 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 4,166 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35071. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,099 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,056 health care providers accessible to residents in 35071, Gardendale, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35071, Gardendale, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score | 86 |
---|---|
People Score | 60 |
Provider Score | 97 |
Hospital Score | 31 |
Travel Score | 63 |
35071 | Gardendale | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The health landscape within ZIP Code 35071, encompassing Gardendale, Alabama, requires a nuanced examination to assess its preparedness for breast cancer care. A "Breast Cancer Score," though not a formally recognized metric, can be constructed by evaluating various factors crucial to patient outcomes, including physician availability, access to specialized care, mental health support, and technological integration. This analysis provides an informed perspective on the current state of affairs.
Primary care availability forms the foundation of effective breast cancer screening and early detection. Gardendale's primary care physician (PCP) to population ratio is a critical starting point. While precise figures fluctuate, a concerning trend in many rural and suburban areas is a shortage of PCPs. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can lead to delayed screenings, missed opportunities for preventative care, and ultimately, later-stage diagnoses. Assessing the specific ratio in 35071 requires accessing data from sources like the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners and the U.S. Census Bureau. This data would then be compared to national benchmarks to gauge the relative adequacy of primary care resources.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and accessibility of primary care are paramount. Are appointments readily available? Do practices offer evening or weekend hours to accommodate working individuals? Do PCPs routinely emphasize breast cancer screening guidelines, including mammograms and clinical breast exams? The answers to these questions directly influence the “Breast Cancer Score.” Practices that proactively implement reminder systems for screenings and provide patient education materials would contribute positively to the score.
Specialist access is the next crucial element. The availability of oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons within a reasonable distance is vital. Patients diagnosed with breast cancer require a multidisciplinary approach, and delays in accessing these specialists can negatively impact prognosis. The proximity of comprehensive cancer centers, ideally with specialized breast cancer programs, significantly enhances the score. Travel time to these facilities, particularly for patients without reliable transportation, must be considered.
The presence of standout practices in Gardendale and the surrounding areas can significantly elevate the overall score. These practices would be characterized by a commitment to early detection, patient-centered care, and a focus on continuous improvement. They would likely utilize advanced imaging technologies, offer genetic counseling for high-risk patients, and participate in clinical trials. Their reputation within the community, as reflected by patient reviews and word-of-mouth referrals, would be a key indicator of their effectiveness.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly relevant, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The ability to conduct virtual consultations with specialists, receive remote monitoring, and access educational resources can bridge geographical barriers and improve patient convenience. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual appointments for follow-up care, discussing test results, and providing support groups online, would receive a higher score. The availability of reliable internet access in the community is also a factor, as it directly impacts the feasibility of telemedicine.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked but critical component of breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a profound impact on a patient’s emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, who specialize in oncology or have experience working with cancer patients is essential. The score benefits from practices that proactively screen patients for mental health issues, offer on-site counseling services, or provide referrals to qualified mental health providers. Support groups, both in-person and virtual, also contribute positively to the score.
The integration of technology beyond telemedicine also plays a role. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, coordinate care, and facilitate communication between providers would receive a higher score. Patient portals that allow individuals to access their medical records, schedule appointments, and communicate with their care team enhance patient empowerment and contribute to a positive patient experience.
The "Breast Cancer Score" for Gardendale is not simply a numerical rating; it is a reflection of the community's commitment to providing comprehensive and compassionate care. It highlights the importance of proactive screening, access to specialized care, mental health support, and the integration of technology. The score is dynamic, constantly evolving as healthcare practices adapt to new advancements and patient needs.
While this analysis provides a general assessment, the specific data and information needed to calculate a precise score requires further investigation. This information is available through public health agencies, medical associations, and healthcare providers.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Gardendale, including the location of physicians, specialist access, and the distribution of healthcare resources, explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their mapping tools can help you visualize the data discussed in this analysis, providing a powerful tool for understanding and navigating the healthcare system.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like