35619, Danville, Alabama Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 35619, Danville, Alabama is 40 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.60 percent of the residents in 35619 has some form of health insurance. 37.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.39 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35619 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,096 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35619. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 796 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,923 health care providers accessible to residents in 35619, Danville, Alabama.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Danville, AL (ZIP Code 35619)

This analysis provides a comprehensive "Breast Cancer Score" assessment for primary care physicians and resources within the Danville, Alabama (ZIP code 35619) area. The score considers factors crucial for early detection, effective treatment, and overall patient well-being, focusing on accessibility, quality of care, and the availability of supportive services. This evaluation aims to inform residents seeking primary care, highlighting strengths and areas for potential improvement within the local healthcare landscape.

The foundation of a strong breast cancer care system begins with accessible and proactive primary care. The physician-to-patient ratio in Danville is a critical indicator. An ideal ratio allows for sufficient time for comprehensive patient evaluations, including regular breast cancer screenings. A low physician-to-patient ratio can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial diagnostic procedures and treatment. The analysis must ascertain the average patient load per primary care physician within the ZIP code. This data, combined with information on appointment availability (routine checkups, mammogram referrals) provides a baseline for accessibility.

Standout practices within Danville will be identified based on several criteria. Practices that prioritize preventative care, including robust screening programs, will receive higher scores. This includes a demonstrated commitment to promoting regular mammograms and clinical breast exams, as recommended by established medical guidelines. Furthermore, the availability of patient education materials, addressing risk factors, and the importance of self-exams, will be evaluated. Practices that proactively engage patients in their own health management are considered superior.

Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and even initial screenings can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. The analysis will investigate the extent to which Danville primary care practices have embraced telemedicine. This includes the availability of virtual appointment scheduling, the use of secure patient portals, and the integration of telehealth services with existing care pathways. Practices successfully implementing telemedicine strategies will receive a higher score.

Beyond the purely medical aspects, the availability of mental health resources is crucial for breast cancer patients. A cancer diagnosis can be emotionally devastating, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health services within the Danville area, including referrals to qualified therapists, support groups, and counseling services. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to addressing the emotional needs of their patients, either through in-house resources or strong referral networks, will be highly regarded.

The evaluation also considers the integration of care. Do primary care physicians have established relationships with local specialists, such as oncologists and surgeons? Efficient referral processes, ensuring seamless transitions between primary care and specialized treatment, are essential for optimal patient outcomes. The analysis will investigate the referral patterns of Danville practices, assessing the speed and efficiency with which patients are connected to specialists. Practices with well-defined referral pathways and strong communication protocols will be favored.

The quality of care extends beyond the availability of services. The analysis will examine the practices' adherence to established clinical guidelines for breast cancer screening and management. This includes the use of evidence-based practices, the regular review of patient records to ensure adherence to screening recommendations, and the implementation of quality improvement initiatives. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement and a focus on patient outcomes will be prioritized.

The analysis will also evaluate the practices' commitment to patient education and empowerment. Do they provide patients with clear and concise information about their diagnosis, treatment options, and potential side effects? Do they actively involve patients in the decision-making process? Practices that prioritize patient education and shared decision-making will be recognized for their patient-centered approach.

The availability of financial assistance programs and resources is another important consideration. Breast cancer treatment can be expensive, and many patients may struggle to afford the cost of care. The analysis will investigate the practices' awareness of and access to financial assistance programs, such as those offered by pharmaceutical companies and charitable organizations. Practices that proactively assist patients in navigating financial challenges will receive a higher score.

The overall "Breast Cancer Score" will be based on a weighted average of these factors. Accessibility (physician-to-patient ratio, appointment availability) will carry significant weight, followed by the quality of care (adherence to guidelines, referral processes), and the availability of supportive services (telemedicine, mental health resources, financial assistance). The final score will provide a comprehensive assessment of the breast cancer care landscape in Danville, AL.

The analysis will also consider the demographic characteristics of the population served by the primary care practices. Are there disparities in access to care based on race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status? The analysis will identify any potential barriers to care and highlight practices that are working to address these disparities.

The conclusion will provide a clear and concise summary of the findings, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the Danville healthcare system. It will also offer recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and strengthening referral networks.

Finally, the analysis will provide a clear and concise conclusion, summarizing the key findings and offering recommendations for improvement. This will include a call to action, encouraging residents to utilize the resources available and to advocate for improved healthcare services in their community.

For a more granular, interactive view of healthcare resources in Danville, including physician locations, practice details, and demographic data, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a visually compelling and data-rich platform for understanding the healthcare landscape.