Breast Cancer Score

36280, Woodland, Alabama Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 36280, Woodland, Alabama

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 36280, Woodland, Alabama is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.93 percent of the residents in 36280 has some form of health insurance. 30.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.02 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36280 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,100 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36280. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 686 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 95 health care providers accessible to residents in 36280, Woodland, Alabama.

Health Scores in 36280, Woodland, Alabama

Breast Cancer Score 12
People Score 45
Provider Score 10
Hospital Score 31
Travel Score 39

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

36280 Woodland Alabama
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 36280, Woodland, Alabama

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Woodland, AL (ZIP Code 36280)

Analyzing the availability and quality of breast cancer care within Woodland, Alabama (ZIP Code 36280) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will assess the landscape of primary care, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized breast cancer services, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, ultimately providing a "Breast Cancer Score" perspective for residents. The goal is to understand the current situation and identify areas for potential improvement, offering a clearer picture for patients navigating this critical aspect of healthcare.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care begins with accessible and competent primary care. Woodland, being a relatively small community, presents both challenges and opportunities. A crucial factor is the physician-to-patient ratio. The ratio indicates the number of primary care physicians available to serve the population. A higher ratio suggests potentially greater accessibility, shorter wait times, and more personalized care. However, this data must be considered in conjunction with the overall health of the community, as a population with a higher prevalence of chronic diseases may place greater demands on available resources. Public health data, alongside local clinic information, is essential for determining this ratio accurately.

Evaluating primary care availability also involves assessing the diversity of services offered. Do local practices provide comprehensive preventative care, including routine breast exams and referrals for mammograms? Are there established relationships with local radiology centers or hospitals equipped with advanced diagnostic tools like 3D mammography (tomosynthesis)? The presence of these services streamlines the patient journey, enabling early detection and prompt intervention, which are critical for successful breast cancer treatment.

Beyond primary care, the availability of specialized breast cancer services is a key determinant of the overall "Breast Cancer Score." This includes the presence of oncologists, surgeons specializing in breast cancer, and radiation oncologists within a reasonable commuting distance. Ideally, Woodland residents should have access to a multidisciplinary team capable of providing comprehensive care, from diagnosis and staging to treatment and survivorship support. The proximity of these specialists, as well as the availability of support staff such as oncology nurses and patient navigators, significantly impacts the quality of care.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can bridge geographical barriers and improve access to specialists, particularly for those living in rural areas. The ability to consult with an oncologist or receive post-operative follow-up care via telehealth can significantly reduce travel burdens and improve patient convenience. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within local practices and hospitals is therefore a vital component of the analysis. Does the local hospital system offer telehealth appointments? Are primary care physicians utilizing telehealth for referrals and follow-up?

Mental health resources are often overlooked, but they are integral to the well-being of breast cancer patients. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can be emotionally and psychologically taxing. Therefore, the availability of mental health support, including therapists, counselors, and support groups, is essential. Assessing the presence of these resources within the community, or within a reasonable distance, is a critical component of the "Breast Cancer Score." Are there local therapists specializing in oncology or cancer-related trauma? Are support groups available for patients and their families?

Identifying standout practices within Woodland is a key aspect of the analysis. This involves recognizing healthcare providers who demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality, patient-centered care. This could include practices that offer extended hours, accept a wide range of insurance plans, or have received positive patient reviews. It also includes practices that actively participate in community outreach and education programs related to breast cancer awareness and prevention.

The "Breast Cancer Score" would then be a composite metric, incorporating all these factors. It would be a relative measure, comparing Woodland's healthcare landscape to other communities or to national benchmarks. The score would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of specialized services, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of standout practices. The score would not be a single number but rather a nuanced assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses within the local healthcare system.

Analyzing the data, it is vital to acknowledge that Woodland, like many rural communities, may face challenges in terms of access to specialized care. The "Breast Cancer Score" might reveal a need for increased investment in primary care, expanded access to telemedicine, and greater collaboration between local providers and regional cancer centers. The analysis should also identify opportunities for community-based initiatives, such as breast cancer awareness campaigns and early detection programs.

The assessment of telemedicine adoption should include not only the availability of virtual appointments but also the technical infrastructure required for effective telehealth delivery. This includes reliable internet access and the availability of necessary equipment, such as video conferencing platforms and remote monitoring devices. The analysis should also consider the digital literacy of the patient population, ensuring that telemedicine services are accessible and user-friendly for all residents.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the impact of social determinants of health on breast cancer outcomes. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and cultural beliefs can significantly influence a patient's ability to access and adhere to treatment. The "Breast Cancer Score" should therefore incorporate an understanding of these factors and identify strategies to address health disparities within the community.

Finally, the analysis should be dynamic, recognizing that the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. Regular updates and reevaluations of the "Breast Cancer Score" are essential to ensure that it remains relevant and reflects the current state of breast cancer care in Woodland. This ongoing assessment can help to identify areas for improvement and guide efforts to enhance the quality of care for all residents.

To visualize and analyze the data related to healthcare access in Woodland and other areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a clear, interactive representation of physician locations, hospital services, and other relevant data points, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 36280, Woodland, Alabama

You may also like

36263, Graham, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 6.60 Miles

Total Population:

36278, Wedowee, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 7.50 Miles

Total Population:

36273, Ranburne, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 11.02 Miles

Total Population:

36264, Heflin, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 16.14 Miles

Total Population:

36274, Roanoke, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 16.19 Miles

Total Population:

36258, Delta, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 16.54 Miles

Total Population:

36266, Lineville, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 19.10 Miles

Total Population:

36276, Wadley, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 20.98 Miles

Total Population:

36255, Cragford, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 36280: 23.81 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 36280, Woodland, Alabama