The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 36540, Gainestown, Alabama is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 81.92 percent of the residents in 36540 has some form of health insurance. 46.12 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.90 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36540 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 291 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36540. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 120 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 128 health care providers accessible to residents in 36540, Gainestown, Alabama.
Health Scores in 36540, Gainestown, Alabama
Breast Cancer Score | 4 |
---|---|
People Score | 27 |
Provider Score | 10 |
Hospital Score | 31 |
Travel Score | 24 |
36540 | Gainestown | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Gainestown, Alabama (ZIP Code 36540)
This analysis examines the landscape of breast cancer care within the Gainestown, Alabama (ZIP Code 36540) area, focusing on primary care physician (PCP) availability and related resources. The goal is to provide a "Breast Cancer Score" assessment, considering factors crucial for early detection, diagnosis, and support. This assessment is not a definitive ranking but rather a nuanced evaluation of the current state of healthcare resources relevant to breast cancer patients and those at risk.
The cornerstone of effective breast cancer care begins with accessible primary care. In Gainestown, the availability of PCPs directly impacts a patient's ability to receive timely screenings, referrals, and ongoing support. Analyzing physician-to-patient ratios is a crucial first step. While specific, up-to-the-minute data on this ratio is dynamic and requires constant updating, publicly available sources like the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the Alabama Department of Public Health can provide estimates. A higher physician-to-patient ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can indicate potential challenges in accessing care. This can translate into longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial screenings and follow-up care. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests a more accessible healthcare environment, allowing for proactive preventative measures and quicker responses to concerns.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is also important. Are the physicians concentrated in a single location, or are they spread throughout the community, providing convenient access for all residents? Geographic barriers, like distance and transportation limitations, can significantly impact a patient's ability to receive care. The presence of multiple practices, ideally with a variety of specialties and affiliations, enhances patient choice and increases the likelihood of finding a provider who aligns with individual needs and preferences.
Identifying "standout practices" requires a deeper dive into the quality of care offered. This involves evaluating factors such as the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for breast cancer screening (e.g., mammograms), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) to facilitate communication and care coordination, and the availability of patient education materials. Practices that actively promote preventative care, offer comprehensive screening programs, and foster a patient-centered approach are likely to score higher in this assessment. Researching patient reviews, if available, can provide valuable insights into the experiences of other patients, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of specific practices.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. The ability to offer virtual consultations, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and mental health support, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients facing mobility issues, transportation challenges, or geographical limitations. Practices that embrace telemedicine technologies can improve patient convenience and potentially reduce the burden on in-person appointments. The availability of telehealth services, including the platforms used, the types of consultations offered, and the ease of use, all contribute to the overall score.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are an integral part of comprehensive breast cancer care. A diagnosis of breast cancer can be emotionally challenging, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, within the community is crucial. Assessing the presence of these resources includes evaluating the number of mental health providers, their proximity to primary care practices, and whether they accept the same insurance plans. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health professionals is also essential, ensuring seamless care coordination and integrated support for patients. Access to support groups, both in-person and online, can also provide invaluable emotional support and a sense of community for patients navigating their diagnosis and treatment.
Specific data points to consider when assessing the "Breast Cancer Score" include: the number of PCPs per 1,000 residents in ZIP Code 36540; the percentage of PCPs who offer mammogram referrals; the availability of on-site mammography services at primary care practices or nearby facilities; the number of mental health professionals per 1,000 residents; the percentage of PCPs who offer telemedicine consultations; and the presence of local breast cancer support groups or resources.
A comprehensive assessment would also consider the availability of specialized breast cancer care, such as oncologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists, within a reasonable distance of Gainestown. While this analysis focuses on primary care, the proximity and accessibility of these specialists are crucial for patients requiring advanced treatment. The presence of a local hospital with a dedicated cancer center or affiliation with a larger cancer network is a significant advantage.
The "Breast Cancer Score" for Gainestown, Alabama, is not a static number. It reflects a dynamic healthcare environment that is constantly evolving. Regular updates and ongoing monitoring are essential to ensure that patients have access to the best possible care. This analysis serves as a starting point for understanding the current state of resources and identifying areas for improvement.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Gainestown, including the distribution of physicians, access to specialists, and the location of healthcare facilities, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a powerful visualization of the data discussed, enabling a more informed assessment of the "Breast Cancer Score" and identifying areas where resources are most needed.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like