36785, Tyler, Alabama Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 36785, Tyler, Alabama is 7 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.27 percent of the residents in 36785 has some form of health insurance. 57.31 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 36785 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 146 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 36785. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 198 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 31 health care providers accessible to residents in 36785, Tyler, Alabama.

**Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 36785 and Primary Care Availability in Tyler**

This analysis examines the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 36785 and the broader context of primary care availability in Tyler, Texas. The goal is to assess the accessibility, quality, and resources available to patients, ultimately culminating in a "Breast Cancer Score" that reflects the overall support system. This score considers factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.

ZIP code 36785, representing a specific geographic area, requires an initial assessment of its healthcare infrastructure. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. We need to determine the number of primary care physicians, oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists specializing in breast cancer care within this ZIP code. This data, ideally sourced from public health databases, medical directories, and insurance provider networks, will reveal the potential for patient access. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of specialists, would negatively impact the Breast Cancer Score. Conversely, a high ratio suggests greater availability and a more favorable score.

Beyond raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. This involves identifying "standout practices" within the area. These practices would be recognized for their advanced technology, such as 3D mammography and minimally invasive surgical techniques. They would also be known for their comprehensive approach, including genetic counseling, patient navigation services, and robust support groups. Patient reviews, accreditations from organizations like the American College of Surgeons, and participation in clinical trials would be key indicators of excellence. The presence of such practices would significantly boost the Breast Cancer Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another vital component. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online support groups enhances accessibility, particularly for patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations. Practices that embrace telemedicine, providing secure and user-friendly platforms, would receive higher marks. This includes the availability of virtual appointments for initial consultations, follow-up care, and even chemotherapy support. The more integrated telemedicine is, the better the score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked but are crucial for patients facing a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. The Breast Cancer Score must account for the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and licensed clinical social workers, who specialize in oncology. Does the practice offer on-site counseling or referrals to mental health services? Are support groups available, either in-person or online? The integration of these resources directly impacts the patient's well-being and, therefore, the overall score. A strong emphasis on mental health support would significantly improve the Breast Cancer Score.

Shifting the focus to Tyler, Texas, we examine the broader primary care landscape. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are often the first point of contact for patients, playing a vital role in early detection and referral. The availability of PCPs, their willingness to perform breast cancer screenings, and their referral patterns to specialists are all crucial. The presence of a robust primary care network in Tyler, with easy access to PCPs, will positively influence the Breast Cancer Score for the entire region.

The primary care network's ability to provide timely referrals to specialists is also critical. Efficient communication between PCPs, oncologists, and surgeons ensures a coordinated approach to patient care. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) and shared care plans facilitates this communication. Practices that prioritize seamless referrals and collaborative care will contribute to a higher Breast Cancer Score.

Furthermore, the availability of diagnostic imaging services in Tyler needs to be assessed. The presence of modern mammography equipment, including 3D mammography (tomosynthesis), is essential for early detection. The turnaround time for imaging results and the expertise of radiologists in interpreting mammograms are also significant factors. Easy access to high-quality diagnostic imaging services will positively impact the Breast Cancer Score.

The Breast Cancer Score for ZIP code 36785 and the Tyler region is not a simple numerical value. It is a composite score reflecting the interplay of multiple factors. It would be calculated by assigning weights to each category (physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, primary care availability, referral patterns, and diagnostic imaging). The weights would reflect the relative importance of each factor. For instance, a strong physician-to-patient ratio might contribute 15% to the score, while the presence of a standout practice might contribute 20%.

The final score would be presented on a scale, perhaps from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a more supportive and accessible breast cancer care environment. This score could be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively.

To visualize and understand this complex healthcare landscape, consider the power of geospatial analysis. Mapping the distribution of physicians, practices, and resources within ZIP code 36785 and the surrounding areas provides invaluable insights. CartoChrome maps can help in visualizing these data points, revealing patterns and disparities that might otherwise be hidden. Explore CartoChrome maps to gain a comprehensive understanding of the breast cancer care environment in your area.