06336, Gilman, Connecticut Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 06336, Gilman, Connecticut is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 06336 has some form of health insurance. 13.58 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 90.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06336 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 39 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06336. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,687 health care providers accessible to residents in 06336, Gilman, Connecticut.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: ZIP Code 06336 and Gilman, CT

This analysis provides a "Breast Cancer Score" assessment for healthcare access and resources within ZIP code 06336, encompassing the town of Gilman, CT, with a focus on primary care availability and related factors crucial for breast cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment support. The scoring system is based on a hypothetical model considering factors like physician density, access to specialized care, telemedicine utilization, and mental health resources. It is essential to remember that this is a theoretical analysis, and specific data points will vary based on ongoing changes in the healthcare landscape.

The foundation of a strong breast cancer care system lies in accessible primary care. In Gilman, a smaller community within 06336, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is paramount. A low physician-to-patient ratio can significantly hinder timely screenings, referrals, and overall preventative care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests potentially easier access to routine checkups and the initiation of breast cancer screening protocols, such as mammograms. The score in this area would be influenced by the number of PCPs actively practicing within the town and surrounding areas, the patient population size, and the acceptance of new patients.

Specialized care is another crucial component. The availability of oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons within a reasonable distance is a significant factor. While Gilman itself might not have these specialists, proximity to larger medical centers in nearby cities like Norwich or New London is vital. The score will reflect the ease of access to these specialists, considering factors like travel time, transportation options, and the availability of appointments. A high score here would indicate a well-connected network of specialists readily accessible to patients in need.

Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in rural or underserved areas. Telemedicine offers a convenient way to access consultations, follow-up appointments, and even mental health services. The score will assess the adoption of telemedicine by local primary care practices and specialists. Practices that offer virtual appointments, remote monitoring, and online patient portals would receive a higher score, indicating a commitment to providing accessible and convenient care.

Mental health support is an often-overlooked but critical aspect of breast cancer care. A diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer can be emotionally and psychologically taxing. The availability of mental health professionals, support groups, and counseling services within the community is crucial. The score will reflect the presence of these resources, including the number of therapists, counselors, and support groups available in Gilman and the surrounding areas. Partnerships between primary care practices and mental health providers would also contribute to a higher score.

The quality of care provided by individual practices is another key consideration. While a general score can be assigned, standout practices with excellent patient reviews, a commitment to early detection, and a focus on patient education will elevate the overall score. These practices often have dedicated breast cancer screening programs, provide comprehensive patient education materials, and actively participate in community outreach programs. Identifying and recognizing these practices is essential for empowering patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

The impact of insurance coverage also needs consideration. The availability of affordable health insurance and the acceptance of various insurance plans by local providers play a crucial role in accessing care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer financial assistance programs would contribute to a higher score, ensuring that financial barriers do not prevent patients from receiving necessary care.

The integration of technology and data analytics is also shaping the future of breast cancer care. Practices that utilize electronic health records, patient portals, and data analytics to track patient outcomes, improve screening rates, and personalize care would receive a higher score. This technological advancement can lead to better patient outcomes and more efficient healthcare delivery.

The overall "Breast Cancer Score" for 06336 and Gilman, CT, will be a composite of all these factors. It is a complex assessment that requires considering the interplay of various elements. A high score would signify a well-resourced community with accessible primary care, specialized care, telemedicine options, robust mental health support, and a commitment to patient-centered care. A lower score would indicate areas for improvement, such as increasing physician density, expanding telemedicine adoption, and enhancing mental health resources.

The specifics of the score would be based on the availability of data. This includes publicly available information on physician counts, hospital locations, and insurance coverage. It would also involve data from local healthcare providers, patient reviews, and community health reports. The analysis would be a snapshot in time, reflecting the current state of healthcare resources and access.

The score is not static. It is subject to change as healthcare providers adapt to new technologies, expand services, and respond to the evolving needs of the community. Regular updates and ongoing monitoring are essential to track progress and identify areas that require further attention. The score should serve as a tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to improve breast cancer care in the community.

The "Breast Cancer Score" analysis is a starting point for understanding the healthcare landscape in 06336 and Gilman. While this analysis provides a theoretical framework, the real-world implications of these factors are significant. It is crucial to remember that this is a general assessment and individual experiences may vary.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, including the location of healthcare providers, specialists, and other resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a spatial understanding of healthcare access, highlighting areas of strength and areas where improvements are needed. Explore the possibilities of CartoChrome maps to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare resources available in your community.