06379, Pawcatuck, Connecticut Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 06379, Pawcatuck, Connecticut is 62 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.54 percent of the residents in 06379 has some form of health insurance. 36.09 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 75.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06379 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,027 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06379. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,710 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,237 health care providers accessible to residents in 06379, Pawcatuck, Connecticut.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Pawcatuck, CT (ZIP Code 06379)

Pawcatuck, Connecticut, nestled within the 06379 ZIP code, presents a unique landscape for breast cancer care. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and assesses the overall breast cancer care score, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem as it relates to breast cancer prevention, detection, and treatment.

The foundation of effective breast cancer care rests upon accessible and proactive primary care. In Pawcatuck, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. Analyzing publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards reveals the approximate number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the estimated population served. A higher ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, generally translates to more readily available appointments, allowing for timely screenings and follow-up care, crucial for early detection. Conversely, a lower ratio can lead to appointment delays and potentially compromise the continuity of care.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating their commitment to preventative care, specifically breast cancer screening protocols. This includes the frequency with which they recommend mammograms based on age and risk factors, their adherence to national guidelines from organizations like the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and their use of patient reminders for screenings. Practices that demonstrate a proactive approach, offering patient education materials and facilitating easy access to mammography services, score higher in this assessment.

Telemedicine adoption is another significant factor. The increasing use of telehealth has expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. Assessing the availability of virtual consultations for primary care visits, follow-up appointments, and even initial consultations for breast cancer concerns provides valuable insights. Practices offering telemedicine options can improve patient convenience, reduce travel burdens, and potentially facilitate quicker access to care, particularly during the diagnostic process.

The integration of mental health resources is a crucial, often overlooked, aspect of breast cancer care. A cancer diagnosis, and the subsequent treatment, can have a profound impact on a patient's emotional well-being. Assessing the availability of mental health services within the primary care setting or through referral networks is vital. This includes evaluating whether practices have on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health professionals, or established protocols for screening patients for depression, anxiety, and other emotional challenges. Practices that prioritize mental health support demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care.

Evaluating specific practices within the 06379 ZIP code involves a thorough review of publicly available information, including practice websites, patient reviews, and data from insurance providers. While specific practice names cannot be mentioned in this analysis, the process involves identifying those that consistently demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, offer convenient access to screening services, embrace telemedicine technologies, and prioritize mental health support. These practices would naturally rank higher in the overall breast cancer care score.

The breast cancer care score is a composite measure, incorporating the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. Each component is weighted based on its relative importance in contributing to positive patient outcomes. A higher score indicates a more favorable healthcare environment for breast cancer patients, characterized by readily accessible care, proactive screening protocols, convenient access to services, and comprehensive support for emotional well-being.

The analysis of the 06379 ZIP code reveals that the breast cancer care score is contingent on several factors. While the physician-to-patient ratio might be acceptable, the availability of specialized breast cancer services within the immediate area could impact the overall score. The need to travel outside the ZIP code for specialized care may pose challenges for some patients. Therefore, the score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape.

The adoption of telemedicine, while increasing, may not be uniform across all practices. Some practices may be more advanced in their use of telehealth technologies than others, offering a wider range of virtual services. The availability of mental health resources also varies. Some practices may have robust mental health support systems in place, while others may rely on external referrals. These disparities impact the overall breast cancer care score.

The analysis also considers the potential impact of socioeconomic factors on breast cancer care. Factors like insurance coverage, access to transportation, and health literacy can influence a patient's ability to access care and adhere to treatment plans. Practices that are sensitive to these factors and offer patient navigation services or financial assistance programs would score higher in this assessment.

In conclusion, the breast cancer care score for Pawcatuck, CT (06379) is a nuanced assessment that reflects the complex interplay of various factors. While the availability of primary care is a key indicator, the quality of that care, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources are equally important. The overall score provides a valuable snapshot of the local healthcare ecosystem, highlighting areas of strength and areas where improvements are needed to ensure optimal breast cancer care for all residents.

For a deeper dive into the healthcare landscape of Pawcatuck and surrounding areas, including detailed maps of physician locations, practice profiles, and access to care indicators, explore the power of CartoChrome maps.