Breast Cancer Score

06414, Cobalt, Connecticut Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut is 86 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 58.93 percent of the residents in 06414 has some form of health insurance. 11.61 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 06414 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 9 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 06414. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 13 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,270 health care providers accessible to residents in 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut.

Health Scores in 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut

Breast Cancer Score 100
People Score 98
Provider Score 86
Hospital Score 80
Travel Score 75

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

06414 Cobalt Connecticut
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut

This analysis delves into the complex landscape of breast cancer care accessibility and quality within ZIP code 06414, focusing on the availability of primary care in Cobalt, Connecticut, and its impact on patient outcomes. We'll explore physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the integration of mental health resources, culminating in a call to action for enhanced geographical visualization through CartoChrome maps.

The cornerstone of effective breast cancer care is early detection and consistent follow-up, which are heavily reliant on accessible primary care. In Cobalt, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly influences the likelihood of timely screenings, referrals to specialists, and overall patient management. A low PCP-to-patient ratio in Cobalt could indicate potential bottlenecks, leading to delayed appointments, reduced screening rates, and ultimately, poorer prognosis for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. Conversely, a robust primary care network, with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, fosters a proactive approach to preventative care and facilitates seamless transitions through the diagnostic and treatment phases.

Within ZIP code 06414, the distribution of primary care practices and their capacity to serve the population is critical. We need to examine the number of PCPs actively practicing, their patient load, and the geographic distribution of their offices. Are there underserved areas within the ZIP code where access to primary care is limited? Are there any practices demonstrating exceptional commitment to breast cancer screening and patient education? Identifying these standout practices, perhaps those with dedicated women's health programs or robust patient navigation systems, would provide valuable insights into best practices and potential models for improvement. These practices might be recognized for their proactive approach to patient outreach, their use of electronic health records to track screening compliance, or their collaborative relationships with local oncologists and radiologists.

Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, has become increasingly relevant, particularly in areas with limited access to specialists. In the context of breast cancer care, telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations with oncologists, radiologists, and genetic counselors, reducing the need for frequent travel and improving access for patients in Cobalt. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine within primary care practices in ZIP code 06414 is essential. Are practices offering virtual appointments for follow-up visits, medication management, or educational sessions? Are they utilizing telehealth platforms to connect patients with specialists for second opinions or remote monitoring? A higher adoption rate of telemedicine could indicate a commitment to patient convenience and a proactive approach to overcoming geographical barriers to care.

The emotional and psychological impact of a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment is profound. Mental health resources are an integral part of comprehensive breast cancer care. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling, support groups, and psychiatric care, within the primary care setting or through readily accessible referral networks, is crucial for supporting patients through their journey. We need to investigate the integration of mental health services within the primary care practices in ZIP code 06414. Do PCPs screen patients for depression and anxiety? Are they equipped to provide basic counseling or connect patients with mental health professionals? Do they have established referral pathways to mental health specialists with expertise in oncology? The presence of robust mental health support can significantly improve patient well-being and adherence to treatment plans.

To comprehensively assess the landscape of breast cancer care in ZIP code 06414, we must consider several key factors. The patient-to-physician ratio, the geographic distribution of practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources all play critical roles in shaping the patient experience and influencing outcomes. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses within the local healthcare ecosystem allows us to pinpoint areas for improvement and implement targeted interventions.

The analysis of physician-to-patient ratios requires detailed data on the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the estimated population served. This information can be obtained from public health agencies, medical associations, and insurance providers. The ideal ratio is not a fixed number, but a range that considers factors such as the age and health status of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the availability of specialists. A ratio that is too high can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with patients, and a greater risk of diagnostic delays.

Identifying standout practices necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This includes reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, assessing the implementation of evidence-based screening guidelines, and examining the use of innovative technologies. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, proactive screening, and seamless coordination of services should be recognized and emulated. This can be achieved through peer-to-peer learning, mentorship programs, and the dissemination of best practices.

The assessment of telemedicine adoption involves evaluating the types of services offered remotely, the technology infrastructure in place, and the training provided to healthcare providers. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow should be highlighted as models for others to follow. This requires assessing the availability of telehealth platforms, the training of healthcare providers, and the patient satisfaction with remote consultations.

The integration of mental health resources can be assessed by examining the presence of on-site mental health professionals, the availability of referral pathways, and the implementation of screening tools for depression and anxiety. Practices that prioritize the mental and emotional well-being of their patients should be commended for their holistic approach to care. This requires assessing the availability of mental health professionals, the use of screening tools, and the implementation of referral pathways.

To visualize this complex data and understand the geographical nuances of breast cancer care in ZIP code 06414 and Cobalt, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can transform raw data into interactive visualizations, allowing you to see the distribution of healthcare resources, identify underserved areas, and analyze the impact of geographic factors on patient outcomes. By using CartoChrome maps, healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients can gain a deeper understanding of the local healthcare landscape and make informed decisions to improve access to care and enhance patient outcomes.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut

You may also like

06456, Middle Haddam, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 1.63 Miles

Total Population:

06424, East Hampton, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 2.71 Miles

Total Population:

06457, Middletown, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 5.75 Miles

Total Population:

06441, Higganum, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 6.60 Miles

Total Population:

06416, Cromwell, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 6.80 Miles

Total Population:

06438, Haddam, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 7.10 Miles

Total Population:

06447, Marlborough, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 7.39 Miles

Total Population:

06455, Middlefield, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 8.87 Miles

Total Population:

06422, Durham, Connecticut
Breast Cancer Score
Breast Cancer Score

Distance from 06414: 9.54 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 06414, Cobalt, Connecticut