20002, Washington, District of Columbia Breast Cancer Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Breast Cancer Score in 20002, Washington, District of Columbia is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.15 percent of the residents in 20002 has some form of health insurance. 29.61 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 20002 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 11,930 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 133 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 20002. An estimate of 25 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 5,335 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 21,104 health care providers accessible to residents in 20002, Washington, District of Columbia.

## Breast Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 20002 and Primary Care Availability in Washington

This analysis examines the landscape of breast cancer care within ZIP code 20002 in Washington, DC, and assesses the broader context of primary care availability across the city, factoring in elements crucial to patient outcomes, such as physician density, access to specialized care, and supportive resources. The goal is to provide an informed perspective on the quality and accessibility of breast cancer services, ultimately informing patients and healthcare providers alike.

ZIP code 20002, encompassing neighborhoods like Northeast DC, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. Its demographic makeup, coupled with its location within the nation's capital, influences the healthcare environment. Analyzing the availability and quality of breast cancer care within this specific area requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not only the presence of oncologists and surgeons but also the supporting infrastructure of primary care, mental health services, and technological advancements.

A critical element in assessing breast cancer care is the physician-to-patient ratio. A higher ratio, indicating a greater concentration of specialists, generally translates to improved access and potentially better outcomes. However, simply counting doctors is insufficient. The analysis must also consider the types of specialists available – medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and breast imaging specialists – and their respective caseloads. Furthermore, the presence of multidisciplinary teams, where various specialists collaborate on patient care, is a significant indicator of quality. Examining the referral patterns between primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists within the area is crucial. Efficient referral pathways can facilitate early detection and prompt treatment, which are vital in breast cancer management.

The availability of primary care is a cornerstone of effective breast cancer care. PCPs play a crucial role in preventative screenings, early detection, and patient education. The density of primary care practices in 20002 and across Washington directly impacts the ease with which women can access mammograms and other essential screenings. Analyzing the patient-to-PCP ratio, coupled with the proximity of practices to residential areas and public transportation, provides a more nuanced understanding of accessibility. The integration of PCPs into the overall breast cancer care continuum, facilitating seamless communication and coordinated care, is a key factor in patient satisfaction and improved outcomes.

Identifying standout practices within 20002 and Washington is essential. This involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction scores, clinical outcomes, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, offering comprehensive services and personalized treatment plans, should be highlighted. Furthermore, the presence of accreditations from organizations like the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) signifies a commitment to quality and adherence to national standards. Examining the availability of support groups, patient navigators, and other resources that address the emotional and practical needs of patients is also critical.

Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, and its adoption in breast cancer care is particularly relevant. Telemedicine offers the potential to expand access to specialists, especially for patients in underserved areas or those with mobility limitations. Analyzing the extent to which practices in 20002 and Washington utilize telemedicine for consultations, follow-up appointments, and remote monitoring is essential. The availability of virtual support groups and educational resources further enhances the value of telemedicine in breast cancer care. The ease of use of telemedicine platforms and the integration of these platforms into existing care workflows are important considerations.

The mental health of breast cancer patients is often overlooked, yet it is a critical component of their overall well-being. The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be incredibly stressful, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Assessing the availability of mental health resources within 20002 and Washington is crucial. This includes the presence of therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who specialize in oncology or have experience working with cancer patients. The integration of mental health services into the overall care plan, offering patients access to support groups, individual therapy, and medication management, is a significant indicator of quality. The availability of these resources, the ease with which patients can access them, and the integration of mental health professionals into the care team are important factors.

The analysis should also consider the availability of financial assistance programs and resources for patients. Breast cancer treatment can be expensive, and financial burdens can significantly impact a patient's ability to access care and adhere to treatment plans. Identifying practices that offer financial counseling, connect patients with support programs, and work to address financial barriers is essential.

The overall assessment of breast cancer care in 20002 and Washington requires a comprehensive approach, integrating quantitative data with qualitative insights. Analyzing physician density, primary care access, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, alongside financial support programs, provides a holistic understanding of the healthcare landscape. This analysis aims to empower patients with information, encouraging them to make informed decisions about their care.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 20002 and Washington, including physician locations, practice accessibility, and the distribution of resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a valuable spatial understanding of the healthcare ecosystem, helping you visualize the data and make informed decisions about your health.